US10036034B2

US10036034B2 - Sequences involved in plant yield and methods of using

Info

Publication number: US10036034B2
Application number: US14/562,182
Authority: US
Inventors: Harkamal Walia; Dante Placido; Thomas E. Clemente
Original assignee: NuTech Ventures Inc
Current assignee: University of Nebraska; NuTech Ventures Inc
Priority date: 2014-02-13
Filing date: 2014-12-05
Publication date: 2018-07-31
Also published as: US20150225736A1; WO2015123278A1

Abstract

Nucleic acid sequences involved in plant yield are provided, as are methods of using such nucleic acid sequences.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Application No. 61/939,329 filed Feb. 13, 2014.

FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with government support under 1121648 awarded by the National Science Foundation. The government has certain rights in the invention.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure generally relates to plants exhibiting increased yield.

BACKGROUND

As agriculture is increasingly shifted to marginal lands and drought events become more frequent and intense, specific root morphological traits that can improve drought tolerance and sustain yields in suboptimal conditions hold immense potential. To effectively incorporate drought-adaptive root traits in crops like wheat and rice, we need to better understand the genetic and physiological basis of adaptive root traits. This disclosure describes several genes that are involved in root development as well as yield.

SUMMARY

This disclosure provides nucleic acid sequences involved in plant yield and methods of using such nucleic acid sequences.

In one aspect, a hybrid, variety, line, or cultivar is provided. Such a hybrid, variety, line, or cultivar includes plants having a mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3. In some embodiments, the plants exhibit an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions. Seed produced by such a hybrid, variety, line, or cultivar also is provided, where the seed includes the mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids having a sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3.

In another aspect, a method of making a plant is provided. Such a method typically includes the steps of inducing mutagenesis in plant cells to produce mutagenized cells, obtaining one or more plants from the mutagenized cells, and identifying at least one of the plants that contains a mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3. Such a method can further include identifying at least one of the plants that exhibits an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions.

Mutagenesis can be induced using a chemical mutagen or ionizing radiation. Representative chemical mutagens include, without limitation, nitrous acid, sodium azide, acridine orange, ethidium bromide, and ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS). Representative ionizing radiation includes, without limitation, x-rays, gamma rays, fast neutron irradiation, and UV irradiation. Mutagenesis can be induced using TALEN or zinc-finger technology.

In another aspect, a method of producing a plant is provided. Such a method can include the steps of crossing at least one plant of a first line with at least one plant of a second line and selecting for progeny plants that have the mutation. Generally, the plant of the first line has a mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids having a sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3. Such a method further can include selecting for progeny plants that exhibit an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions.

A mutation as described herein can be, without limitation, a point mutation, an insertion, a deletion, or a substitution.

In still another aspect, a transgenic plant is provided that includes a plant expression vector. Typically, the expression vector includes a nucleic acid molecule that is at least 25 nucleotides in length and has at least 91% sequence identity to a sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3. In some embodiments, expression of the nucleic acid molecule results in plants exhibiting an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not having or not expressing the nucleic acid molecule under corresponding conditions. Seed produced by such a transgenic plant also is provided, where the seed includes the expression vector.

In one aspect, a transgenic plant is provided that includes a heterologous nucleic acid molecule of at least 25 nucleotides in length, wherein the nucleic acid molecule hybridizes under stringent conditions to a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3. In some embodiments, expression of the heterologous nucleic acid molecule results in plants exhibiting an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not having or not expressing the nucleic acid molecule under corresponding conditions. Seed produced by such a transgenic plant also is provided, where the seed includes the heterologous nucleic acid molecule.

In one aspect, a transgenic plant is provided that includes a vector. Generally, the vector includes a nucleic acid molecule having at least 91% sequence identity to 25 or more contiguous nucleotides of a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3. In some embodiments, expression of the nucleic acid molecule results in the plant exhibiting an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not having or not expressing the nucleic acid molecule under corresponding conditions.

In another aspect, a method of making a transgenic plant is provided. Such a method typically includes expressing a transgene in the plant. The transgene encodes a double-stranded RNA molecule that inhibits expression from a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3. The double-stranded RNA molecule includes at least 25 consecutive nucleotides having 91% or greater sequence identity to a sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3. In some embodiments, expression of the transgene results in the plant exhibiting an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not having or not expressing the nucleic acid molecule under corresponding conditions. In some embodiments, the double-stranded RNA molecule has a sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 5 or 6.

In another aspect, a method of producing a plant is provided. Such a method generally includes the steps of introducing a heterologous nucleic acid molecule operably linked to a promoter into plant cells to produce transgenic plant cells, and regenerating transgenic plants from the transgenic cells. Typically, the heterologous nucleic acid molecule includes at least 25 nucleotides in length and has at least 91% sequence identity to a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3. Such transgenic plants exhibit an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not having or not expressing the heterologous nucleic acid molecule under corresponding conditions. Such a method further can include selecting at least one of the transgenic plants that exhibits an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not having or not expressing the heterologous nucleic acid molecule under corresponding conditions.

In some embodiments, the nucleic acid is in sense orientation, while, in some embodiments, the nucleic acid is in antisense orientation.

In still another aspect, a transgenic plant is provided that includes a plant expression vector. Generally, the expression vector includes a nucleic acid molecule having at least 95% sequence identity to a sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3, or a fragment of any of those sequences encoding a functional polypeptide. In some embodiments, expression of the nucleic acid molecule or a functional fragment thereof results in plants exhibiting a decrease in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, a decrease in root biomass under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, a decrease in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or a decrease in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof under corresponding conditions. Seed produced by such a transgenic plant also is provided, where the seed includes the expression vector.

In another aspect, a transgenic plant is provided that includes a heterologous nucleic acid molecule. Generally, the nucleic acid molecule hybridizes under stringent conditions to a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3, or a fragment thereof encoding a functional polypeptide. In some embodiments, expression of the heterologous nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof results in plants exhibiting a decrease in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, a decrease in root biomass under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, a decrease in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or a decrease in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof under corresponding conditions. Seed produced by such a transgenic plant also is provided, where the seed includes the heterologous nucleic acid molecule.

In one aspect, seed from a transgenic plant is provided that includes a vector. Typically, such a vector includes a nucleic acid molecule having at least 95% sequence identity to a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3, or a fragment thereof encoding a functional polypeptide. In some embodiments, expression of the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof results in the seed exhibiting a decrease in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, a decrease in root biomass under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, a decrease in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or a decrease in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof under corresponding conditions.

In another aspect, a method of producing a plant is provided. Such a method typically includes the steps of introducing a heterologous nucleic acid molecule operably linked to a promoter into plant cells to produce transgenic cells, and regenerating transgenic plants from the transgenic cells, wherein the transgenic plants exhibit a decrease in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, a decrease in root biomass under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, a decrease in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or a decrease in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the heterologous nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof under corresponding conditions. The heterologous nucleic acid molecule typically has at least 95% sequence identity to a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3, or a fragment thereof encoding a functional polypeptide. Such a method further can include selecting at least one of the transgenic plants that exhibits a decrease in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, a decrease in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, a decrease in root biomass under limiting water conditions, a decrease in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, a decrease in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or a decrease in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the heterologous nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof under corresponding conditions. In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleic acid molecule is introduced into the plant cells using particle bombardment, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, microinjection, polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation, liposome-mediated DNA uptake, or electroporation.

In still another aspect, a transgenic plant is provided that includes a plant expression vector. Generally, the expression vector includes a nucleic acid molecule having at least 95% sequence identity to a sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 9 or 11, or a fragment of any of those sequences encoding a functional polypeptide. In some embodiments, expression of the nucleic acid molecule or a functional fragment thereof results in plants exhibiting an increase in the average size of the seed (i.e., length, width and thickness) relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof. Seed produced by such a transgenic plant also is provided, where the seed includes the expression vector.

In another aspect, a transgenic plant is provided that includes a heterologous nucleic acid molecule. Generally, the nucleic acid molecule hybridizes under stringent conditions to a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 9 or 11, or a fragment thereof encoding a functional polypeptide. In some embodiments, expression of the heterologous nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof results in plants exhibiting an increase in the average size of the seed (i.e., length, width and thickness) relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof. Seed produced by such a transgenic plant also is provided, where the seed includes the heterologous nucleic acid molecule.

In one aspect, seed from a transgenic plant is provided that includes a vector. Typically, such a vector includes a nucleic acid molecule having at least 95% sequence identity to a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 9 or 11, or a fragment thereof encoding a functional polypeptide. In some embodiments, expression of the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof results in the seed exhibiting an increase in the average size of the seed (i.e., length, width and thickness) relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof.

In another aspect, a method of producing a plant is provided. Such a method typically includes the steps of introducing a heterologous nucleic acid molecule operably linked to a promoter into plant cells to produce transgenic cells, and regenerating transgenic plants from the transgenic cells, wherein the transgenic plants exhibit an increase in the average size of the seed (i.e., length, width and thickness) relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof. The heterologous nucleic acid molecule typically has at least 95% sequence identity to a nucleic acid sequence such as SEQ ID NOs: 9 or 11, or a fragment thereof encoding a functional polypeptide. Such a method further can include selecting at least one of the transgenic plants that exhibits an increase in the average size of the seed (i.e., length, width and thickness) relative to a corresponding plant not expressing the nucleic acid molecule or functional fragment thereof. In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleic acid molecule is introduced into the plant cells using particle bombardment, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, microinjection, polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation, liposome-mediated DNA uptake, or electroporation.

In another aspect, a method of screening plants is provided. Such a method typically includes providing a mutant or transgenic plant as described herein, and determining the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, lateral root density under limiting water conditions, root biomass under limiting water conditions, the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant not having a mutation or having or expressing a transgene under corresponding conditions.

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the methods and compositions of matter belong. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the methods and compositions of matter, suitable methods and materials are described below. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting. All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS Part A

FIG. 1 are images of the wheat-Agropyron elongatum (7Ag.7DL) translocation. A CIMMYT hexaploid wheat cultivar Pavon76 carrying a chromosome 7 segment from Agropyron elongatum (7Ag.7DL) is visualized by genomic in situ hybridization. In both images (right and left), green staining represents the translocated segment from Agropyron. Wheat genomic probe was directly labeled with rhodamine (red). Root system architecture analysis was performed on the background parent, Pavon76, the Pavon76 (7Ag.7DL) translocation line and a segregating null line.

FIG. 2 are photographs of harvested spring wheat cultivar P76 genotypes grown in greenhouse under (A) well-watered and (B) limited-water environments. The images shown are of 18 day old P76 genotypes grown in tubes containing fine sand. The genotypes are labeled as Pavon 76 (“P76”), Pavon 76 with 1-96-1 translocation (“TL”) and TL sister line lacking the 1-96-1 translocation (“NC”).

FIG. 3 are graphs showing the results of physiological analyses to assess the response by each genotype under well-watered and limited-water conditions. Panel A shows the photosynthetic rate (Pn), Panel B shows the stomatal conductance (g,) and Panel C shows the transpiration rate (E) measurements obtained for the 18 d old post-transplanted spring wheat plants using the LI-COR 6400. Panel D shows the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′); Panel E shows photochemical quenching (qP); and Panel F shows non-photochemical quenching (qN). Experiments were performed three times independently. At least nine individual leaves for each genotype in each experiment were measured. Error bars represent standard error. Statistical significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA using Tukeys method. Bars with *** are statistically different at p≤0.001. As above, the genotypes are labeled Pavon 76 (“P76”), Pavon 76 with 1-96-1 translocation (“TL”) and TL sister line lacking the 1-96-1 translocation (“NC”).

FIG. 4 are graphs showing A/Ci curve analysis of the Pavon 76 (P76), Pavon 76 with 1-96-1 translocation (TL) and TL sister line lacking the 1-96-1 translocation (NC) under well-watered (Panel A) and limited-water environment (Panel B). The CO₂assimilation rates, A (μmol m⁻²s⁻¹), were measured at light saturation (PAR=1000 μmol m⁻²s⁻¹) and were recorded at different chamber CO₂concentration. Experiments were performed three times independently. Six leaf samples per genotype per experiment were used for measurements.

FIG. 5 are graphs showing gene expression analysis of root-related genes by qRT-PCR method. Panels A-C show the expression of microarray genes in early seedling stages using root tissues collected at 2 d, 4 d and 6 d. The genotypes are labeled Pavon 76 (P76), Pavon 76 with 1-96-1 translocation (TL) and TL sister line lacking the 1-96-1 translocation (NC). P76 at 2 d was used as a reference for comparison for each gene expression. Panels D-E show the validation of micro array gene expression using cDNA from 18 d root tissues of P76, TL and NC. The P76 well-watered value was used as a baseline for comparison for gene expression analysis. The representative genes are the following: KNAT3=Knotted-like homeobox gene 3 (in Arabidopsis; also known as LRD7=Lateral Root Density 7 (in wheat); E2f=E2F-like transcription factor; SERKI=Somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase 1. The error bars represent standard error. The experiment was performed using three biological replicates with two technical replicates per sample. Statistical significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA using Tukeys method. Bars with *** are statistically different at p≤0.001, while those with ** indicate a statistical difference at p≤0.01 and *=p≤0.05.

FIG. 6 is a schematic showing the predicted root-associated gene network based on transcriptome data from the wheat experiment. The network was generated by leveraging the wheat-rice orthologous relationship. Wheat genes differentially expressed between Pavon 76 (P76) and Pavon 1-96-1 translocation line (TL) were identified, their orthologs used to seed the network using RiceNet network tool. The displayed network is populated by genes known to be involved in root trait regulation in model species such as Arabidopsis. New genes connected to the input gene set were identified based on RiceNet analysis. The network includes cellulose synthase (CESA3), Chitinase-like 1 (CTL1), Cobra1 (COB 1), Receptor-like Kinase902 (RLK902), Glycosyl Hydrolase 9B7 (GH9B7), Brassinosteroid Insensitivel (BRIt), Protein Phosphatase 2C (PP2C), Erecta-like1 (ERL1), Somatic Embryogenesis Receptor Kinase I (SERKI), F-Box21 (FBL21), and Leucine-Rich Repeat 1 (LRR1).

FIG. 7 is a schematic showing in silico mapping of wheat genes on the rice genome using single feature polymorphism analysis (SFP). An SFP analysis was performed by comparing the TL line with P76 and NC to obtain microarray probes that exhibited significant hybridization difference among the genotypes, putatively due to underlying sequence polymorphism. Rice orthologs (vertical bars) of the wheat SFP probe sets were mapped to the rice genome (horizontal bars representing the 10 chromosomes). Based on this analysis, a major rice gene cluster (boxed) on chromosome 6 was identified that has a syntenic relationship with the wheat long arm of chromosome 7D. Rice orthologs in grey represent wheat genes that were differentially expressed between the TL and control genotypes (P76 and NC) under limiting water conditions.

FIG. 8 is an alignment to validate polymorphic probes identified via Single Feature Polymorphism (SFP) analysis. Three wheat probes identified from the rice ortholog cluster that emerged from in silico mapping of rice orthologs to the syntenic region between wheat 7DL and rice chromosome 6 were selected (top set: Probe 7, SEQ ID NO:77; middle set: Probe 8, SEQ ID NO:78; bottom set: Probe 3, SEQ ID NO:79). PCR amplicons were cloned and sequenced from Pavon 76 (Pavon; SEQ ID NOs:80-82 (top to bottom)), Pavon 76 with 1-96-1 translocation (Pavon-TL; SEQ ID NOs:83-85 (top to bottom)), TL sister line lacking the 1-96-1 translocation (Pavon-Null; SEQ ID NOs:86-88 (top to bottom)), and the consensus sequence (Ta . . . ; SEQ ID NOs:89-91 (top to bottom)). The alignment shows the sequence obtained from the clones, the consensus probe set sequence and the SFP analysis identified probe sequence match. Mismatches are colored red.

FIG. 9 is photographs of chromosome mapping of five root trait-associated candidate genes using the wheat genetic stocks. Using Chinese Spring, nulli-tetrasomic and di-telosomic lines for Group 7, PCR-based mapping of candidate genes was performed. The representative genes are KNAT3 (Knotted-like homeobox gene 3 in Arabidopsis; also known as LRD7=Lateral Root Density 7 in wheat) and SERKI (Somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase 1). These two genes were selected because they were differentially regulated between the TL line and control genotypes, and because their rice orthologs mapped to chromosome 6 with syntenic relation to wheat chromosome 7D long arm. With the exception of AgI, four genes mapped to wheat chromosome 7DL. CS: Chinese Spring; N7AT7B: Nullisomic 7A-Tetrasomic 7B; N7AT7D: Nullisomic 7A-Tetrasomic 7D; N7BT7A: Nullisomic 7B-Tetrasomic 7D; N7BT7D: Nullisomic 7B-Tetrasomic 7A; N7DT7A: Nullisomic 7D-Tetrasomic 7B; N7DT7B: Nullisomic 7D-Tetrasomic 7B; 7Dt7DL: Ditelosomic 7DL; 7Dt7DS: Ditelosomic 7DS.

Part B

FIG. 10 is data demonstrating that Agropyron introgression improves drought response. Panel (a) shows wheat chromosome 7D (in red) with Agropyron introgression (in green) visualized using genomic in situ hybridization. Panel (b) is a photograph of a six-day old seedling of Pavon76 (P76) grown under limited water (LW), showing a lower number of roots and lateral root density compared to the photograph shown in Panel (c) of roots of the translocation line (TL) grown under limited water. Panel (d) is a graph showing that LW stress reduced the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) compared to well-watered (WW) conditions in P76 but not in TL (mean±sd, n=9) in 18 d-old plants. Panel (e) is a graph showing that TL maintained stomatal conductance (gs) under LW conditions whereas stomatal conductance was reduced in P76 under LW conditions (mean±sd, n=9). Panel (f) is a graph showing allele-specific expression of LRD7 in seedling roots, demonstrating that the wheat allele, LRD7Ta, increased under LW conditions and the Agropyron allele, LRD7Ag, was repressed under LW conditions. Expression of LRD7 under LW conditions is shown relative to the expression under well-watered (WW) conditions for each genotype (mean±sd, from 3 biological and 2 technical replicates). “a” indicates a significant difference between LW and WW at p<0.05.

FIG. 11 is data demonstrating that LRD7 negatively regulates root traits. Panel (a) is a graph showing data from experiments in which seedlings of CBO37, RNAi and OE events for LRD7 were grown in WW and LW conditions and assayed for lateral root density on the primary root. Lateral root density decreased in CBO37 and OE events in LW but not in the RNAi events (mean±sd, n=30). Panel (b) is a photograph showing that, in the pre-tillering stage, CBO37, RNAi and OE plants differed in root length under a 20 d LW treatment. The RNAi events maintained root length under LW, unlike CBO37 and the OE events. Panels (c) and (d) are graphs of data demonstrating that root length and root dry weight were higher in the RNAi plants compared to CBO37 and OE plants in LW (mean±sd, n=9). Panel (e) is a graph showing that net photosynthetic rate (Pn) declined in all genotypes in response to LW. However, the decline in Pn in the RNAi events was less than that observed in CBO37 and the OE events (mean±sd, n=9). Panel (f) is a graph showing that the LRD7 RNAi events did not experience a drop in the stomatal conductance (gs) under LW. “a” indicates significant difference between the WW and LW and “b” indicates significant difference between the RNAi or OE and CBO37 in LW at p<0.05.

FIG. 12 is data demonstrating that LRD7 negatively regulates yield components. Panel (a) is a photograph showing a comparison of wheat seed size among CBO37, LRD7 RNAi, and OE events demonstrated by aligning 10 seeds from a pool of 10 plants per genotype. Panel (b) is a graph showing the number of seeds per wheat plant. Plants were grown to maturity in well-watered greenhouse conditions (mean±sd, n=10). Panel (c) is a graph showing 1,000-grain weight of CBO, LRD7 RNAi, and OE wheat plants grown in field conditions. Data from 3 independent transgenic events, 10 plants per genotype are shown. Panel (d) is a photograph showing rice seed size comparisons among CBO37, OsLRD7 RNAi, and OE plants demonstrated by aligning 10 seeds from a pool of 10 plants per genotype grown under field conditions. Panel (e) is a graph showing the number of seed bearing tillers per plant for Kitaake, OsLRD7 RNAi, and OE field grown plants at harvest (n=30 plants per genotype). Panel (f) is a graph showing 1,000-grain weight of Kitaake, OsLRD7 RNAi, and OE rice plants grown under field conditions. Data from 3 independent transgenic plants, 5 plants per genotype are shown. Panel (g) is a photograph showing a number of primary branches in the panicles from Kitaake, OsLRD7 RNAi, and OE plants. In Panels b-c and e-f, “a” represents significance at p<0.05 between CBO37 and RNAi or OE plants. Scale bar for Panels a and d is 1 mm and for Panel g is 30 mm.

FIG. 13 is data showing that gibberellins (GA) regulate lateral root formation in wheat. Panel (a) is a graph showing GA1 levels in P76 and TL roots in WW and LW conditions (mean±sd, n=30). “a” represents differences between WW and LW for a genotype and “b” represents significant genotypic differences under LW (p<0.05). Panel (b) is a graph showing expression of Agropyron allele of LRD7 (LRD7Ag) in the TL line in WW and LW conditions, with and without GA3 treatment. Transcript abundance was measured relative to WW, non-GA3 treated sample (mean±sd, n=3). “a” represents significant differences between WW and LW for roots with GA3 and no GA3 treatment, “b” represents a significant difference in response to GA treatment (p<0.05). Panel (c) is a graph showing that LRD7Ta is down-regulated by GA3 treatment in LW conditions. Expression values were obtained relative to WW, non-GA3 treated sample as control (mean±sd, n=3). “a” represents significant differences between WW and LW for a genotype and “b” represents significant genotypic differences in LW conditions (p<0.05). Panels (d) and (e) are graphs showing that expression of GA2ox, a GA catabolic gene, was up-regulated in the wheat genotypes P76, CBO37 and OE events in LW (mean±sd, n=3). The “a” represents significance between WW and LW and “b” indicates significance between CBO37 and RNAi or OE events or between P76 and TL under LW (p<0.05).

FIG. 14 is data demonstrating rice yield parameters from controlled environment grown plants. Panel A is a photograph showing plantlets of the wild type rice, Kitaake (left), OsLRD7 RNAi line plants (middle), and OsLRD7 overexpression line (right). OsLRD7 is the rice homolog of wheat LRD7. Kitaake plants were used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation to suppress and overexpress OsLRD7 (LOC_Os06g43860). Panel B is a photograph showing ten seeds from Kitaake (top), OsLRD7 RNAi (middle), and OsLRD7 overexpression lines aligned to demonstrate seed size difference. The RNAi lines have larger seeds compared to wild type Kitaake. In addition, OsLRD7 RNAi lines had increased yield due to more viable seeds per panicle than Kitaake (Panel C), increased number of tillers (branches) (Panel D), and an increased 100 seed weight than Kitaake (Panel E). This indicates that suppressing OsLRD7 can increase yield. Data was collected from greenhouse grown plants.

FIG. 15 are sequence alignments. FIG. 15A is an alignment, created using CLUSTALW, between the LRD7 protein from Agropyron elongatum (SEQ ID NO:92) and from the P76 (SEQ ID NO:93) and TL (SEQ ID NO:94) lines. The (*) indicates complete homology, while single (.) or double dots (:) indicate lack of homology. The dashes (-) are used to fill-in the missing amino acid residue. The underlined sequences denote conserved domains identified in the coding region (e.g., KNOX2, ELK and homeodomain). 8 non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and two deletions, both in the P76 sequence, were identified. A single SNP was identified in the homeodomain; ELK and KNOX2 domain sequences were identical among the genotypes. FIG. 15B is an alignment of the promoter region of LRD7 from the translocation line TL (SEQ ID NO:95), the wild relative, Agropyron elongatum (SEQ ID NO:96), and P76 (SEQ ID NO:97). The sequence from the Agropyron elongatum and the TL line have higher conservation compared to P76, which suggests that the regulatory sequences and LRD7 regulation is conserved between the Agropyron line and the TL.

FIG. 16 is data demonstrating that LRD7 negatively regulates lateral root number. Seedlings of wild type (CBO37), 3 RNAi and 3 overexpression events (OE) for LRD7 grown in well watered (WW) and limited water (LW) conditions were assayed for primary root length (Panel a), seminal root length (Panel b), lateral root number on the primary root (Panel c), and shoot length (Panel d) (mean±sd, n=30). A significant decline in lateral root number was observed for CBO37 and OE, but not in the RNAi events in response to LW treatment. “a” indicates significant differences between the WW and LW at p<0.05. This data indicates that lateral root number is the major root architecture component affected by LW, and LRD7 maintains lateral root number in LW relative to WW seedlings.

FIG. 17 is data demonstrating that shoot growth is maintained under drought stress in LRD7 RNAi events. Shoot growth was measured in WW and LW condition in pre-tillering stage CBO37, RNAi and OE plants. Shoot length (Panel a) and shoot biomass (dry weight; Panel b) decreased in CBO37 and OE events in LW compared to WW plants (mean±sd, n=30). “a” indicates significant differences between the WW and LW at p<0.05 and “b” indicates a significant difference between CBO37 and the RNAi lines in LW at p<0.05.

FIG. 18 is data demonstrating that LRD7 negatively regulates seed size in wheat. Seed size (length, width and thickness) from mature plants of CBO37, RNAi and OE events grown in well-watered, optimal greenhouse conditions was measured. The RNAi events had increased seed size compared to CBO37 and the OE events had smaller seed size than CBO37 (n=100, from two independent biological replicates). “a” indicates a significant difference between the CBO37 and the RNAi or OE events at p<0.05.

FIG. 19 is data demonstrating that LRD7Ta is expressed during early seed development. The RNAi events for LRD7Ta have larger seed size and the OE events have smaller seeds compared to CBO37. Public wheat gene expression database (PlexDB) indicated that LRD7Ta is expressed in most tissues but its expression is higher during early seed development relative to later stage of developing seed. Panel (a) is a photograph of developing

wheat seeds

24, 48, 72 and 96 h after pollination (hap), demonstrating that such seeds exhibit a rapid increase in size after pollination. Panel (b) is a graph showing expression of LRD7Ta, measured during early seed development using qRT-PCR (mean±sd, n=3). It was found that the expression of LRD7Ta peaked at 48 hap, which corresponds to the syncytial stage of wheat endosperm. Syncytial endosperm is characterized by rapidly dividing nuclei and is one of the determinants of seed size. The 24 hap seeds were used as a control to measure relative expression.

FIG. 20 is a graph showing grain weight improvement in field conditions. The 1,000-grain weight (g) of grains harvested from CBO37, three RNAi and three OE events grown under natural field conditions with no irrigation was measured. The grain weight was obtained from a pool of seeds derived from more than 85 plants for each event and CBO37.

FIG. 21 is a graph showing auxin levels in roots of the P76 and TL lines. IAA levels were measured in the roots from P76 and the TL line under WW and LW conditions. IAA levels increased in P76 under LW but did not change in the TL line. These results indicated that the reduced lateral roots observed in P76 under LW is likely not due to lower IAA in the roots (mean±sd, n=15). “a” indicates a significant difference between the WW and LW treatments at p<0.05.

FIG. 22 is a graph showing that root GA1 levels in RNAi events are maintained under low water. GA1 levels were measured in the roots from 6 d seedlings of the CBO37, RNAi and OE events under WW and LW conditions. GA1 decreased in CBO37 and OE roots but did not change in the RNAi roots (mean±sd, n=30). GA1 levels in the RNAi events were similar to the levels in CBO37 and OE events, which suggests that LRD7 could be altering GA sensitivity of the wheat seedlings. “a” indicates a significant difference between the WW and LW treatments at p<0.05.

FIG. 23 are graphs showing that expression levels of GA biosynthesis and signaling genes are unaffected in the TL and RNAi roots during water stress. Panels (a)-(c) are graphs showing the relative expression of GA related genes in P76 and TL roots from 6 d old seedlings under WW and LW conditions. Expression values are relative to P76 WW samples used as control (mean±sd, n=3). “a” represents a significant expression difference between WW and LW for a given genotype, and “b” represents a significant difference between P76 and TL in LW at p<0.05. Panels (d)-(f) are graphs showing the relative expression of GA-related genes in CBO37, RNAi and OE events in roots from 6 d old seedlings under WW and LW conditions. Expression values are relative to CBO37 WW samples used as control (mean±sd, n=3). “a” represents a significant expression difference between WW and LW for a given genotype, “b” represents a significant difference between CBO37 and RNAi or OE events under LW, and “c” represents a significant expression difference between CBO37 and OE events under WW conditions at p<0.05.

FIG. 24 are graphs showing photosynthetic and stomatal conductance during a progressive drought stress. Panel (a) is a graph showing sand moisture content in the pre-tillering drought stress experiment at 21, 24 and 27 d after transplanting the seedlings from CBO37, RNAi and OE events (mean±sd, n=9). The water availability continues to decline in the LW treatment tubes. Panel (b) is a graph showing that net photosynthetic rate (Pn) declined in all genotypes at 21, 24 and 27 d in response to LW. However, the Pn decline in RNAi events was less than that observed in CBO37 and OE events (mean±sd, n=9). Panel (c) is a graph showing that the LRD7 RNAi events did not experience a drop in the stomatal conductance (gs) at the three time points in LW. “a” indicates significant differences between the WW and LW at p<0.05, and “b” indicates significant (p<0.05) differences between the RNAi or OE and CBO37 in LW.

FIG. 25 is a graph showing expression of LRD7Ta in the RNAi and OE events. Gene expression of LRD7Ta from three independent RNAi and OE events used in this study was compared to wild type, CBO37 using qRT-PCR. Expression value of RNAi and OE events are relative to CBO37 expression (set as 1). Leaf tissue from well-watered plants was used for expression analysis (n=3 plants for each independent transgenic event from T2 generation).

Part C

FIG. 26 is data showing the effects of the rice homolog of the E2F-related gene on rice. Panels A and B are photographs showing seed size and grain size, respectively, of plants overexpressing the rice E2F-related sequence (top), wild type plants (middle) and plants expressing an E2F-related RNAi sequence (bottom). Panels C, D, and E are graphs showing seed length, seed width and seed thickness, respectively, and Panels F, G and H are graphs showing the grain length, grain width, and grain thickness, respectively of wild type plants (WT), over-expression plants (OX1, OX2, OX3) and RNAi-expressing plants (RI1, RI2, RI3).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This disclosure is based on the discovery that nucleic acids in plants, represented by SEQ ID NO:1 in wheat and SEQ ID NO:3 in rice, and the polypeptides they encode (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 2 or 4, respectively) are involved in the length of the primary root, the length of the seminal root, lateral root density, and/or root biomass when plants are grown under limiting water conditions (compared to corresponding plants lacking the mutation under corresponding growing conditions). This disclosure also is based on the discovery that the same nucleic acids (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3) and the polypeptides they encode (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 2 or 4, respectively) are involved in the number of seeds per plant, the average size of the seed, and/or the average weight of the seed when plants are grown under water conditions that are not limiting (compared to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding growing conditions).

Based on this discovery, the level of expression of such nucleic acid sequences and/or the function of such polypeptides can be modulated in a number of plant species including, without limitation, Medicago sativa (alfalfa), Hordeum vulgare (barley), Phaseolus vulgaris (beans), Zea mays (corn), Gossypium spp. (cotton), Linum usitatissimum (flax), Lens culinaris (lentil), Elaeis guineensis (palm), Pisum sativum (pea), Brassica napus (rapeseed), Oryza sativa (rice), Secale cereal (rye), Sorghum bicolor (sorghum), Glycine max (soybean), Helianthus annuus (sunflower), Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass), Lolium perenne (Perennial ryegrass), Festuca arundinacea (Tall fescue), Festuca spp (Fine-leaf fescues), Agrostis palustris (Creeping bentgrass), Cynoden dactylon (Bermudagrass), Zoysia japonica (Zoysia), and Triticum aestivum (wheat).

Nucleic Acids and Polypeptides

Representative nucleic acids are provided herein from wheat (see, for example, SEQ ID NO:1) or from rice (see, for example, SEQ ID NO:3). As used herein, nucleic acids can include DNA and RNA, and includes nucleic acids that contain one or more nucleotide analogs or backbone modifications. A nucleic acid can be single stranded or double stranded, which usually depends upon its intended use. The nucleic acids provided herein encode polypeptides (see, for example, SEQ ID NOs: 2 or 4, respectively).

Also provided are nucleic acids and polypeptides that differ from such representative sequences (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3 and SEQ ID NOs: 2 or 4, respectively). Nucleic acids and polypeptides that differ in sequence from SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3 and SEQ ID NOs: 2 or 4, can have at least 50% sequence identity (e.g., at least 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% sequence identity) to SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3 or SEQ ID NOs: 2 or 4, respectively.

In calculating percent sequence identity, two sequences are aligned and the number of identical matches of nucleotides or amino acid residues between the two sequences is determined. The number of identical matches is divided by the length of the aligned region (i.e., the number of aligned nucleotides or amino acid residues) and multiplied by 100 to arrive at a percent sequence identity value. It will be appreciated that the length of the aligned region can be a portion of one or both sequences up to the full-length size of the shortest sequence. It also will be appreciated that a single sequence can align with more than one other sequence and hence, can have different percent sequence identity values over each aligned region.

The alignment of two or more sequences to determine percent sequence identity can be performed using the computer program ClustalW and default parameters, which allows alignments of nucleic acid or polypeptide sequences to be carried out across their entire length (global alignment). Chenna et al., 2003, Nucleic Acids Res., 31(13):3497-500. ClustalW calculates the best match between a query and one or more subject sequences, and aligns them so that identities, similarities and differences can be determined. Gaps of one or more residues can be inserted into a query sequence, a subject sequence, or both, to maximize sequence alignments. For fast pairwise alignment of nucleic acid sequences, the default parameters can be used (i.e., word size: 2; window size: 4; scoring method: percentage; number of top diagonals: 4; and gap penalty: 5); for an alignment of multiple nucleic acid sequences, the following parameters can be used: gap opening penalty: 10.0; gap extension penalty: 5.0; and weight transitions: yes. For fast pairwise alignment of polypeptide sequences, the following parameters can be used: word size: 1; window size: 5; scoring method: percentage; number of top diagonals: 5; and gap penalty: 3. For multiple alignment of polypeptide sequences, the following parameters can be used: weight matrix: blossom; gap opening penalty: 10.0; gap extension penalty: 0.05; hydrophilic gaps: on; hydrophilic residues: Gly, Pro, Ser, Asn, Asp, Gln, Glu, Arg, and Lys; and residue-specific gap penalties: on. ClustalW can be run, for example, at the Baylor College of Medicine Search Launcher website or at the European Bioinformatics Institute website on the World Wide Web.

Changes can be introduced into a nucleic acid molecule (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3), thereby leading to changes in the amino acid sequence of the encoded polypeptide (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 2 or 4). For example, changes can be introduced into nucleic acid coding sequences using mutagenesis (e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, PCR-mediated mutagenesis) or by chemically synthesizing a nucleic acid molecule having such changes. Such nucleic acid changes can lead to conservative and/or non-conservative amino acid substitutions at one or more amino acid residues. A “conservative amino acid substitution” is one in which one amino acid residue is replaced with a different amino acid residue having a similar side chain (see, for example, Dayhoff et al. (1978, in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, 5(Suppl. 3):345-352), which provides frequency tables for amino acid substitutions), and a non-conservative substitution is one in which an amino acid residue is replaced with an amino acid residue that does not have a similar side chain.

As used herein, an “isolated” nucleic acid molecule is a nucleic acid molecule that is free of sequences that naturally flank one or both ends of the nucleic acid in the genome of the organism from which the isolated nucleic acid molecule is derived (e.g., a cDNA or genomic DNA fragment produced by PCR or restriction endonuclease digestion). Such an isolated nucleic acid molecule is generally introduced into a vector (e.g., a cloning vector, or an expression vector) for convenience of manipulation or to generate a fusion nucleic acid molecule, discussed in more detail below. In addition, an isolated nucleic acid molecule can include an engineered nucleic acid molecule such as a recombinant or a synthetic nucleic acid molecule.

As used herein, a “purified” polypeptide is a polypeptide that has been separated or purified from cellular components that naturally accompany it. Typically, the polypeptide is considered “purified” when it is at least 70% (e.g., at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 99%) by dry weight, free from the polypeptides and naturally occurring molecules with which it is naturally associated. Since a polypeptide that is chemically synthesized is, by nature, separated from the components that naturally accompany it, a synthetic polypeptide is “purified.”

Nucleic acids can be isolated using techniques routine in the art. For example, nucleic acids can be isolated using any method including, without limitation, recombinant nucleic acid technology, and/or the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). General PCR techniques are described, for example in PCR Primer: A Laboratory Manual, Dieffenbach & Dveksler, Eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1995. Recombinant nucleic acid techniques include, for example, restriction enzyme digestion and ligation, which can be used to isolate a nucleic acid. Isolated nucleic acids also can be chemically synthesized, either as a single nucleic acid molecule or as a series of oligonucleotides.

Polypeptides can be purified from natural sources (e.g., a biological sample) by known methods such as DEAE ion exchange, gel filtration, and hydroxyapatite chromatography. A polypeptide also can be purified, for example, by expressing a nucleic acid in an expression vector. In addition, a purified polypeptide can be obtained by chemical synthesis. The extent of purity of a polypeptide can be measured using any appropriate method, e.g., column chromatography, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, or HPLC analysis.

A vector containing a nucleic acid (e.g., a nucleic acid that encodes a polypeptide) also is provided. Vectors, including expression vectors, are commercially available or can be produced by recombinant DNA techniques routine in the art. A vector containing a nucleic acid can have expression elements operably linked to such a nucleic acid, and further can include sequences such as those encoding a selectable marker (e.g., an antibiotic resistance gene). A vector containing a nucleic acid can encode a chimeric or fusion polypeptide (i.e., a polypeptide operatively linked to a heterologous polypeptide, which can be at either the N-terminus or C-terminus of the polypeptide). Representative heterologous polypeptides are those that can be used in purification of the encoded polypeptide (e.g., 6×His tag, glutathione S-transferase (GST))

Expression elements include nucleic acid sequences that direct and regulate expression of nucleic acid coding sequences. One example of an expression element is a promoter sequence. Expression elements also can include introns, enhancer sequences, response elements, or inducible elements that modulate expression of a nucleic acid. Expression elements can be of bacterial, yeast, insect, mammalian, or viral origin, and vectors can contain a combination of elements from different origins. As used herein, operably linked means that a promoter or other expression element(s) are positioned in a vector relative to a nucleic acid in such a way as to direct or regulate expression of the nucleic acid (e.g., in-frame). Many methods for introducing nucleic acids into host cells, both in vivo and in vitro, are well known to those skilled in the art and include, without limitation, electroporation, calcium phosphate precipitation, polyethylene glycol (PEG) transformation, heat shock, lipofection, microinjection, and viral-mediated nucleic acid transfer.

Vectors as described herein can be introduced into a host cell. As used herein, “host cell” refers to the particular cell into which the nucleic acid is introduced and also includes the progeny of such a cell that carry the vector. A host cell can be any prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell. For example, nucleic acids can be expressed in bacterial cells such as E. coli, or in insect cells, yeast or mammalian cells (such as Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) or COS cells). Other suitable host cells are known to those skilled in the art.

Nucleic acids can be detected using any number of amplification techniques (see, e.g., PCR Primer: A Laboratory Manual, 1995, Dieffenbach & Dveksler, Eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,195; 4,683,202; 4,800,159; and 4,965,188) with an appropriate pair of oligonucleotides (e.g., primers). A number of modifications to the original PCR have been developed and can be used to detect a nucleic acid.

Nucleic acids also can be detected using hybridization. Hybridization between nucleic acids is discussed in detail in Sambrook et al. (1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.; Sections 7.37-7.57, 9.47-9.57, 11.7-11.8, and 11.45-11.57). Sambrook et al. discloses suitable Southern blot conditions for oligonucleotide probes less than about 100 nucleotides (Sections 11.45-11.46). The Tm between a sequence that is less than 100 nucleotides in length and a second sequence can be calculated using the formula provided in Section 11.46. Sambrook et al. additionally discloses Southern blot conditions for oligonucleotide probes greater than about 100 nucleotides (see Sections 9.47-9.54). The Tm between a sequence greater than 100 nucleotides in length and a second sequence can be calculated using the formula provided in Sections 9.50-9.51 of Sambrook et al.

The conditions under which membranes containing nucleic acids are prehybridized and hybridized, as well as the conditions under which membranes containing nucleic acids are washed to remove excess and non-specifically bound probe, can play a significant role in the stringency of the hybridization. Such hybridizations and washes can be performed, where appropriate, under moderate or high stringency conditions. For example, washing conditions can be made more stringent by decreasing the salt concentration in the wash solutions and/or by increasing the temperature at which the washes are performed. Simply by way of example, high stringency conditions typically include a wash of the membranes in 0.2×SSC at 65° C.

In addition, interpreting the amount of hybridization can be affected, for example, by the specific activity of the labeled oligonucleotide probe, by the number of probe-binding sites on the template nucleic acid to which the probe has hybridized, and by the amount of exposure of an autoradiograph or other detection medium. It will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that although any number of hybridization and washing conditions can be used to examine hybridization of a probe nucleic acid molecule to immobilized target nucleic acids, it is more important to examine hybridization of a probe to target nucleic acids under identical hybridization, washing, and exposure conditions. Preferably, the target nucleic acids are on the same membrane.

A nucleic acid molecule is deemed to hybridize to a nucleic acid but not to another nucleic acid if hybridization to a nucleic acid is at least 5-fold (e.g., at least 6-fold, 7-fold, 8-fold, 9-fold, 10-fold, 20-fold, 50-fold, or 100-fold) greater than hybridization to another nucleic acid. The amount of hybridization can be quantitated directly on a membrane or from an autoradiograph using, for example, a PhosphorImager or a Densitometer (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.).

Polypeptides can be detected using antibodies. Techniques for detecting polypeptides using antibodies include enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), Western blots, immunoprecipitations and immunofluorescence. An antibody can be polyclonal or monoclonal. An antibody having specific binding affinity for a polypeptide can be generated using methods well known in the art. The antibody can be attached to a solid support such as a microtiter plate using methods known in the art. In the presence of a polypeptide, an antibody-polypeptide complex is formed.

Detection (e.g., of an amplification product, a hybridization complex, or a polypeptide) is usually accomplished using detectable labels. The term “label” is intended to encompass the use of direct labels as well as indirect labels. Detectable labels include enzymes, prosthetic groups, fluorescent materials, luminescent materials, bioluminescent materials, and radioactive materials.

SEQ ID NO:1 and 3 are predicted to encode polypeptides (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 2 and 4) that belong to the Lateral Root Density 7 (LRD7) family of sequences that confer drought tolerance through larger roots. LRD7 from wheat has homology to knotted-like3 (KNAT3; At5g25220), a homeobox gene from Arabidopsis thaliana that acts as a negative regulator of lateral root development (Truernit et al., 2006, Plant Mol. Biol., 60:1-20; Truernit and Haseloff, 2007, Plant Signal. Behav., 2:10-12). The Agropyron allele, LRD7Ag, is down-regulated by drought stress, allowing continued lateral root growth; however, the allele in domesticated wheat, LRD7Ta, is not repressed, thereby limiting root growth and water uptake. In addition to the LRD7 nucleic acid and polypeptide sequences disclosed herein, exemplary related sequences (e.g., those having at least 95% sequence identity) are shown in Accession Nos. BAJ85164.1, BAJ89425.1, AAQ11887.1 and XP_003563314.1.

(Arabidopsis KNAT3 nucleic acid sequence)

SEQ ID NO: 7

ATGGCGTTTCATCACAATCATCTCTCACAAGACCTCTCCTTCAATCATTT

CACCGACCAACACCAACCTCCACCTCCGCAACCGCCTCCTCCTCCTCCGC

AACAGCAACAACATTTCCAAGAAGCACCGCCTCCTAATTGGTTAAACACA

GCGCTTCTTCGTTCCTCAGATAACAACAATAACTTCCTCAACCTCCACAC

AGCCACCGCTAACACCACAACCGCAAGCAGCTCCGATTCTCCTTCCTCCG

CCGCCGCCGCCGCCGCTGCTAACCAGTGGCTATCTCGCTCCTCCTCTTTC

CTCCAACGAAACAACAACAACAACGCTTCCATAGTCGGAGATGGGATCGA

TGATGTCACCGGAGGAGCAGACACTATGATTCAGGGAGAGATGAAAACCG

GCGGTGGAGAAAACAAAAACGACGGCGGAGGAGCTACGGCGGCGGATGGA

GTAGTGAGCTGGCAGAATGCGAGACACAAGGCGGAGATCCTTTCGCATCC

TCTTTACGAGCAGCTTTTGTCGGCGCACGTTGCTTGTTTGAGAATCGCGA

CTCCGGTTGATCAGCTTCCGAGAATCGATGCTCAGCTTGCTCAGTCTCAA

CACGTCGTCGCTAAATACTCAGCTTTAGGCGCCGCCGCTCAAGGTCTCGT

CGGCGACGATAAAGAACTTGACCAGTTCATGACACATTATGTGTTGCTAC

TGTGTTCATTTAAAGAGCAATTGCAACAACATGTGCGTGTTCATGCAATG

GAAGCTGTGATGGCTTGTTGGGAGATTGAGCAGTCTCTTCAAAGCTTAAC

AGGAGTGTCTCCTGGAGAAGGGATGGGAGCAACAATGTCTGACGATGAAG

ATGAACAAGTAGAGAGTGATGCTAATATGTTCGATGGGGGATTAGATGTG

TTGGGTTTTGGTCCTTTGATTCCTACTGAGAGTGAGAGGTCGTTGATGGA

AAGAGTTAGACAAGAACTTAAACATGAACTCAAACAGGGTTACAAGGAGA

AGATAGTAGACATAAGAGAGGAGATATTAAGGAAGAGAAGAGCTGGGAAG

TTACCAGGAGATACCACCTCTGTTCTCAAAGCTTGGTGGCAATCTCATTC

CAAATGGCCTTACCCTACTGAGGAAGATAAGGCGAGGTTGGTGCAAGAGA

CAGGTTTGCAGCTAAAACAGATAAACAATTGGTTCATCAATCAGAGAAAG

AGGAACTGGCATAGCAATCCATCTTCTTCCACTGTATTGAAGAACAAACG

CAAAAGCAATGCAGGTGACAATAGCGGAAGAGAGCGGTTCGCGTAG

(Arabidopsis KNAT3 amino acid sequence)

SEQ ID NO: 8

MAFHHNHLSQDLSFNHFTDQHQPPPPQPPPPPPQQQQHFQEAPPPNWLNT

ALLRSSDNNNNFLNLHTATANTTTASSSDSPSSAAAAAAANQWLSRSSSF

LQRNNNNNASIVGDGIDDVTGGADTMIQGEMKTGGGENKNDGGGATAADG

VVSWQNARHKAEILSHPLYEQLLSAHVACLRIATPVDQLPRIDAQLAQSQ

HVVAKYSALGAAAQGLVGDDKELDQFMTHYVLLLCSFKEQLQQHVRVHAM

EAVMACWEIEQSLQSLTGVSPGEGMGATMSDDEDEQVESDANMFDGGLDV

LGFGPLIPTESERSLMERVRQELKHELKQGYKEKIVDIREEILRKRRAGK

LPGDTTSVLKAWWQSHSKWPYPTEEDKARLVQETGLQLKQINNWFINQRK

RNWHSNPSSSTVLKNKRKSNAGDNSGRERFA

In addition to LRD7, nucleic acid sequences having homology to E2F-related (E2F) transcription factor and somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase-1 (SERKI) were identified as being involved in regulation of root biomass. E2F transcription factors are a family of proteins that regulate cell cycle progression in plants and animals and, in Arabidopsis, is a negative regulator of lateral root formation (del Pozo et al., 2002, Plant Cell, 18:2224-35; Ramirez-Parra et al., 2004, Plant Cell, 16:2350-63). SERK sequences are members of the Leucine-rich repeat, receptor-like kinase protein family and play a role in root differentiation, somatic embryogenesis and gamete development (Walker, 1994, Plant Mol. Biol., 26:1599-609; Schmidt et al., 1997, Develop., 124:2049-62; Somleva et al., 2000, Plant Cell Rep., 19:718-26; Hecht et al., 2001, Plant Physiol., 127:803-16).

Plants and Methods of Making

Hybrids, varieties, lines, or cultivars are provided that have a mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids described herein (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3). As described herein, plants having a mutation in one or more of the endogenous nucleic acids (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3) can exhibit an increase in the length of the primary root, an increase in the length of the seminal root, an increase in lateral root density and/or an increase in root biomass when grown under limiting water conditions, compared to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions). In addition, plants having a mutation in one or more of the endogenous nucleic acids (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3) can exhibit an increase in the number of seeds per plant, an increase in the average size of the seed, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed when grown under water conditions that are not limiting, compared to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions).

Methods of making a plant having a mutation are known in the art. Mutations can be random mutations or targeted mutations. For random mutagenesis, plant cells can be mutagenized using, for example, a chemical mutagen, ionizing radiation, or fast neutron bombardment (see, e.g., Li et al., 2001, Plant J., 27:235-42). Representative chemical mutagens include, without limitation, nitrous acid, sodium azide, acridine orange, ethidium bromide, and ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS), while representative ionizing radiation includes, without limitation, x-rays, gamma rays, fast neutron irradiation, and UV irradiation. The dosage of the mutagenic chemical or radiation is determined experimentally for each type of plant tissue such that a mutation frequency is obtained that is below a threshold level characterized by lethality or reproductive sterility. The number of M₁generation seed or the size of M₁plant populations resulting from the mutagenic treatments are estimated based on the expected frequency of mutations. For targeted mutagenesis, representative technologies include TALEN technology (see, for example, Li et al., 2011, Nucleic Acids Res., 39(14):6315-25), zinc-finger technology (see, for example, Wright et al., 2005, The Plant J., 44:693-705), and CRISPR technology (see, for example, Mali et al., 2013, Nature Methods, 10:957-63). Whether random or targeted, a mutation can be a point mutation, an insertion, a deletion, a substitution, or combinations thereof.

Conserved domains in polypeptides can be important for polypeptide function as well as cellular or subcellular location. FIG. 15A shows an alignment of LRD7 coding sequences from Agropyron elongatum and from the P76 and TL lines. The underlined sequences denote conserved domains (KNOX2, ELK and homeodomain) in the coding region. FIG. 15B shows an alignment of LRD7 promoter sequences from Agropyron elongatum and from the P76 and TL lines.

As discussed herein, one or more nucleotides can be mutated to alter the expression and/or function of the encoded polypeptide, relative to the expression and/or function of the corresponding wild type polypeptide. It will be appreciated, for example, that a mutation in one or more of the highly conserved regions would likely alter polypeptide function, while a mutation outside of those conserved regions would likely have little to no effect on polypeptide function. In addition, a mutation in a single nucleotide can create a stop codon, which would result in a truncated polypeptide and, depending on the extent of truncation, loss-of-function.

A mutation in one of the nucleic acids disclosed herein results in reduced or even complete elimination of LRD7 expression and/or activity in a plant comprising the mutation. Suitable types of mutations include, without limitation, insertions of nucleotides, deletions of nucleotides, or transitions or transversions. In some instances, a mutation is a point mutation; in some instances, a mutation encompasses multiple nucleotides. In some cases, a sequence includes more than one mutation or more than one type of mutation.

For example, a mutation in a promoter sequence can result in reduced or complete elimination of LRD7 expression in a plant comprising the mutation. For example, a mutation in a promoter sequence can alter or eliminate the binding or recognition site of a transcription factor or of the polymerase enzyme, or a mutation in a promoter sequence can alter or eliminate the function of an enhancer, an activator or the like, or a repressor, a silencer or the like. Mutations in a promoter sequence can result in altered or absent transcription, or production of a less-than-functional or non-functional transcript. A less-than-functional or non-functional transcript can result from improper expression (e.g., expressed in the wrong place or at the wrong time), or from degradation of the transcript. Alternatively, a mutation in a promoter sequence may allow transcription to take place, but may interfere with or eliminate the ability of the transcript to be translated.

Mutations in a coding sequence can result in insertions of one or more amino acids, deletions of one or more amino acids, and/or non-conservative amino acid substitutions in the encoded polypeptide. Insertion or deletion of amino acids in a coding sequence, for example, can disrupt the conformation of the encoded polypeptide. Amino acid insertions or deletions also can disrupt sites important for recognition of a binding ligand or for activity of the polypeptide. It is known in the art that the insertion or deletion of a larger number of contiguous amino acids is more likely to render the gene product non-functional, compared to a smaller number of inserted or deleted amino acids. In addition, one or more mutations can change the localization of a polypeptide, introduce a stop codon to produce a truncated polypeptide, or disrupt an active site or domain (e.g., a catalytic site or domain, a binding site or domain) within the polypeptide.

Non-conservative amino acid substitutions can replace an amino acid of one class with an amino acid of a different class. Non-conservative substitutions can make a substantial change in the charge or hydrophobicity of the gene product. Non-conservative amino acid substitutions can also make a substantial change in the bulk of the residue side chain, e.g., substituting an alanine residue for an isoleucine residue. Examples of non-conservative substitutions include a basic amino acid for a non-polar amino acid, or a polar amino acid for an acidic amino acid.

Polypeptides can include particular sequences that determine where the polypeptide is located within the cell, within the membrane, or outside of the cell. Target peptide sequences often are cleaved (e.g., by specific proteases that recognize a specific nucleotide motif) after the polypeptide is localized to the appropriate position. By mutating the target sequence or a cleavage motif, the location of the polypeptide can be altered.

It would be understood by a skilled artisan that mutations also can include larger mutations such as, for example, deletion of most or all of the promoter, deletion of most of all of the coding sequence, or deletion or translocation of the chromosomal region containing some or all of the LRD7 sequences. It would be understood, however, that, the larger the mutation, the more likely it is to have an effect on other traits as well.

Following mutagenesis, M₀plants are regenerated from the mutagenized cells and those plants, or a subsequent generation of that population (e.g., M₁, M₂, M₃, etc.), can be screened for a mutation in a sequence of interest (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3). Screening for plants carrying a mutation in a sequence of interest can be performed using methods routine in the art (e.g., hybridization, amplification, combinations thereof) or by evaluating the phenotype of the plants (e.g., the length of the primary root, the length of the seminal root, lateral root density, root biomass, the number of seeds per plant, the average size of the seed, and/or the average weight of the seed). Generally, the presence of a mutation in one or more of the nucleic acid sequences disclosed herein (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3) results in an increase in the length of the primary root, an increase in the length of the seminal root, an increase in lateral root density, and/or an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, or an increase in the number of seeds per plant, an increase in the average size of the seed and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, compared to a corresponding plant (e.g., having the same varietal background) lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions.

As used herein, an “increase” in the length of the primary root, the length of the seminal root, in lateral root density, and/or in root biomass under limiting water conditions, or in the number of seeds per plant, the average size of the seed and/or the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, refers to an increase (e.g., a statistically significant increase) in the indicated feature under the indicated water condition by at least about 5% up to about 95% (e.g., about 5% to about 10%, about 5% to about 20%, about 5% to about 50%, about 5% to about 75%, about 10% to about 25%, about 10% to about 50%, about 10% to about 90%, about 20% to about 40%, about 20% to about 60%, about 20% to about 80%, about 25% to about 75%, about 50% to about 75%, about 50% to about 85%, about 50% to about 95%, and about 75% to about 95%) relative to the same feature from a corresponding plant lacking the mutation grown under corresponding conditions. As used herein, statistical significance refers to a p-value of less than 0.05, e.g., a p-value of less than 0.025 or a p-value of less than 0.01, using an appropriate measure of statistical significance, e.g., a one-tailed two sample t-test.

An M₁plant may be heterozygous for a mutant allele and exhibit a wild type phenotype. In such cases, at least a portion of the first generation of self-pollinated progeny of such a plant exhibits a wild type phenotype. Alternatively, an M₁plant may have a mutant allele and exhibit a mutant phenotype. Such plants may be heterozygous and exhibit a mutant phenotype due to a phenomenon such as dominant negative suppression, despite the presence of the wild type allele, or such plants may be homozygous due to independently induced mutations in both alleles.

A plant carrying a mutant allele can be used in a plant breeding program to create novel and useful cultivars, lines, varieties and hybrids. Thus, in some embodiments, an M₁, M₂, M₃or later generation plant containing at least one mutation is crossed with a second plant, and progeny of the cross are identified in which the mutation(s) is present. It will be appreciated that the second plant can contain the same mutation as the plant to which it is crossed, a different mutation, or be wild type at the locus. Additionally or alternatively, a second line can exhibit a phenotypic trait such as, for example, disease resistance, high yield, leaf quality, height, plant maturation, stalk size, and/or leaf number per plant.

Breeding is carried out using known procedures. DNA fingerprinting, SNP or similar technologies may be used in a marker-assisted selection (MAS) breeding program to transfer or breed mutant alleles into other lines, varieties or cultivars, as described herein. Progeny of the cross can be screened for a mutation using methods described herein, and plants having a mutation in a nucleic acid sequence disclosed herein (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3) can be selected. For example, plants in the F₂or backcross generations can be screened using a marker developed from a sequence described herein or a fragment thereof, using one of the techniques listed herein. Plants also can be screened for the length of the primary root, the length of the seminal root, in lateral root density, and/or in root biomass under limiting water conditions, or in the number of seeds per plant, the average size of the seed and/or the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and those plants having one or more of such phenotypes, compared to a corresponding plant that lacks the mutation, can be selected. Plants identified as possessing the mutant allele and/or the mutant phenotype can be backcrossed or self-pollinated to create a second population to be screened. Backcrossing or other breeding procedures can be repeated until the desired phenotype of the recurrent parent is recovered.

Successful crosses yield F₁plants that are fertile and that can be backcrossed with one of the parents if desired. In some embodiments, a plant population in the F₂generation is screened for the mutation or variant gene expression using standard methods (e.g., PCR with primers based upon the nucleic acid sequences disclosed herein). Selected plants are then crossed with one of the parents and the first backcross (BC₁) generation plants are self-pollinated to produce a BC₁F₂population that is again screened for variant gene expression. The process of backcrossing, self-pollination, and screening is repeated, for example, at least four times until the final screening produces a plant that is fertile and reasonably similar to the recurrent parent. This plant, if desired, is self-pollinated and the progeny are subsequently screened again to confirm that the plant contains the mutation and exhibits variant gene expression. Breeder's seed of the selected plant can be produced using standard methods including, for example, field testing, genetic analysis, and/or confirmation of the phenotype.

The result of a plant breeding program using the mutant plants described herein are novel and useful cultivars, varieties, lines, and hybrids. As used herein, the term “variety” refers to a population of plants that share constant characteristics which separate them from other plants of the same species. A variety is often, although not always, sold commercially. While possessing one or more distinctive traits, a variety is further characterized by a very small overall variation between individual with that variety. A “pure line” variety may be created by several generations of self-pollination and selection, or vegetative propagation from a single parent using tissue or cell culture techniques. A “line,” as distinguished from a variety, most often denotes a group of plants used non-commercially, for example, in plant research. A line typically displays little overall variation between individuals for one or more traits of interest, although there may be some variation between individuals for other traits.

Depending on the plant, hybrids can be produced by preventing self-pollination of female parent plants (i.e., seed parents) of a first variety, permitting pollen from male parent plants of a second variety to fertilize the female parent plants, and allowing F₁hybrid seeds to form on the female plants. Self-pollination of female plants can be prevented by emasculating the flowers at an early stage of flower development. Alternatively, pollen formation can be prevented on the female parent plants using a form of male sterility. For example, male sterility can be produced by cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS), nuclear male sterility, genetic male sterility, molecular male sterility wherein a transgene inhibits microsporogenesis and/or pollen formation, or self-incompatibility. Female parent plants containing CMS are particularly useful. In embodiments in which the female parent plants are CMS, the male parent plants typically contain a fertility restorer gene to ensure that the F₁hybrids are fertile. In other embodiments in which the female parents are CMS, male parents can be used that do not contain a fertility restorer. F₁hybrids produced from such parents are male sterile. Male sterile hybrid seed can be interplanted with male fertile seed to provide pollen for seed-set on the resulting male sterile plants.

Varieties, lines and cultivars described herein can be used to form single-cross F₁hybrids. In such embodiments, the plants of the parent varieties can be grown as substantially homogeneous adjoining populations to facilitate natural cross-pollination from the male parent plants to the female parent plants. The F₂seed formed on the female parent plants is selectively harvested by conventional means. One also can grow the two parent plant varieties in bulk and harvest a blend of F₁hybrid seed formed on the female parent and seed formed upon the male parent as the result of self-pollination. Alternatively, three-way crosses can be carried out wherein a single-cross F₁hybrid is used as a female parent and is crossed with a different male parent. As another alternative, double-cross hybrids can be created wherein the F₁progeny of two different single-crosses are themselves crossed. Self-incompatibility can be used to particular advantage to prevent self-pollination of female parents when forming a double-cross hybrid.

In addition to mutation, another way in which LRD7 expression can be reduced or knocked-out is to use inhibitory RNAs (e.g., RNAi). Therefore, transgenic plants are provided that contain a transgene encoding at least one RNAi molecule, which, when expressed, silences at least one of the endogenous nucleic acids described herein (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3). As described herein, such transgenic plants exhibit an increase in the length of the primary root, an increase in the length of the seminal root, an increase in lateral root density, and/or an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, or an increase in the number of seeds per plant, an increase in the average size of the seed and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting (e.g., compared to a plant lacking or not expressing the RNAi).

RNAi technology is known in the art and is a very effective form of post-transcriptional gene silencing. RNAi molecules typically contain a nucleotide sequence (e.g., from about 18 nucleotides in length (e.g., about 19 or 20 nucleotides in length) up to about 700 nucleotides in length) that is complementary to the target gene in both the sense and antisense orientations. The sense and antisense strands can be connected by a short “loop” sequence (e.g., about 5 nucleotides in length up to about 800 nucleotides in length) and expressed in a single transcript, or the sense and antisense strands can be delivered to and expressed in the target cells on separate vectors or constructs. A number of companies offer RNAi design and synthesis services (e.g., Life Technologies, Applied Biosystems), and representative RNAi molecules to the sequences described herein are provided in SEQ ID NOs: 5 and 6.

The RNAi molecule can be expressed using a plant expression vector. The RNAi molecule typically is at least 25 nucleotides in length and has at least 91% sequence identity (e.g., at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% sequence identity) to one of the nucleic acid sequences disclosed herein (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3) or hybridizes under stringent conditions to one of the nucleic acid sequences disclosed herein (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3). Hybridization under stringent conditions is described above.

Methods of introducing a nucleic acid (e.g., a heterologous nucleic acid) into plant cells are known in the art and include, for example, particle bombardment, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, microinjection, polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation (e.g., of protoplasts, see, for example, Yoo et al. (2007, Nature Protocols, 2(7):1565-72)), liposome-mediated DNA uptake, or electroporation. Following transformation, the transgenic plant cells can be regenerated into transgenic plants. As described herein, expression of the transgene results in plants that exhibit an increase in the length of the primary root, an increase in the length of the seminal root, an increase in lateral root density, and/or an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, or an increase in the number of seeds per plant, an increase in the average size of the seed and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, relative to a plant not expressing the transgene. The regenerated transgenic plants can be screened for the length of the primary root, the length of the seminal root, lateral root density, and/or root biomass under limiting water conditions, or the number of seeds per plant, the average size of the seed and/or the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, compared to a corresponding non-transgenic plant, and can be selected for use in, for example, a breeding program as discussed herein.

The sequences described herein can be overexpressed in plants, if so desired. Therefore, transgenic plants are provided that are transformed with a nucleic acid molecule described herein (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3) or a functional fragment thereof under control of a promoter that is able to drive expression in plants (e.g., a plant promoter). As discussed herein, a nucleic acid molecule used in a plant expression vector can have a different sequence than a sequence described herein, which can be expressed as a percent sequence identity (e.g., relative to SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3) or based on the conditions under which sequences hybridize (e.g., to SEQ ID NOs: 1 or 3). As an alternative to using a full-length sequence, a portion of the sequence can be used that encodes a polypeptide fragment having the desired functionality (referred to herein as a “functional fragment”). When used with respect to nucleic acids, it would be appreciated that it is not the nucleic acid fragment that possesses functionality but the encoded polypeptide fragment.

Following transformation, the transgenic cells can be regenerated into transgenic plants, which can be screened for the length of the primary root, the length of the seminal root, lateral root density, and/or root biomass under limiting water conditions, or the number of seeds per plant, the average size of the seed and/or the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and plants having increased amounts of at least one of such features, compared to the feature in a corresponding non-transgenic plant, can be selected and used, for example, in a breeding program as discussed herein.

Food or Feed Products and Methods of Making

The plants described herein (e.g., exhibiting an increase in the length of the primary root, an increase in the length of the seminal root, an increase in lateral root density, and/or an increase in root biomass when grown under limiting water conditions, or exhibiting an increase in the number of seeds per plant, an increase in the average size of the seed, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed when grown under water conditions that are not limiting, compared to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions) or portions thereof (e.g., seed or grain, seed oil, or leaf) can be used in food products for consumption by humans or in feed products for consumption by companion animals or animals raised for commercial purposes. In addition, the plants described herein also exhibited an increase in shoot biomass under limiting water conditions, which can be used to increase the above-ground biomass for use with turf grasses or in plants that are useful in the production of biofuels or bioenergy.

The plants described herein or portions thereof can be used in food products for human consumption. Food products can be, without limitation, pasta (e.g., spaghetti), a baked product (e.g., bread, cake, cookies, or biscuits), a snack food (e.g., chips, crackers, energy bars, or energy drinks), or a meat (e.g., chicken, pork, beef, or fish). In addition, the plants described herein or portions thereof can be used in feed products for animal consumption. Animals can be a companion animal (e.g., dogs, cats, birds, fish, potbelly pigs, reptiles, amphibians, and rodents) or an animal raised for commercial purposes (e.g., chickens, turkeys, game birds, cattle, fish, pigs, sheep, wild birds, frogs, shrimp, snails, reptiles, amphibians, and rodents).

In accordance with the present invention, there may be employed conventional molecular biology, microbiology, biochemical, and recombinant DNA techniques within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature. The invention will be further described in the following examples, which do not limit the scope of the methods and compositions of matter described in the claims.

EXAMPLES Part A Example 1—Plant Material

The translocation line (TL) and the P76 line used in this study were obtained from A. J. Lukaszewski, University of California, Riverside. These included a third generation derivative of the original wheat-Agropyron translocation chromosome produced by E. R. Sears (Sears, 1978, Proc. 8^thCongress of Eucarpia II Interspecific Gene Transfer, 63-72) and controls. The starting chromosome Transfer #1 (Sears, supra) was generated by the phI b-induced homoeologous recombination and it consists of normal 7DS, a short proximal segment of 7DL and a long distal segment of A. elongatum chromosome 7EL. A line of cv. Chinese Spring homozygous for Transfer #1 was crossed and backcrossed three times to cv. Pavon 76. The last two backcrosses were to a phI b line of Pavon, resulting in several plants heterozygous for Transfer #1 and homozygous for the phib mutation. These plants were grown, self-pollinated and their progenies screened to identify secondary wheat-Agropyron recombinant chromosomes. Among many such chromosomes isolated there was chromosome labeled 1-96 (Zhang et al., 2005, TAG, 111:573-82).

Chromosome 1-96 is essentially a normal chromosome 7D of wheat with terminal segment of the long arm, perhaps 20% in length, originating from 7E of A. elongatum. The A. elongatum segment carries Lr 19 and Y. This chromosome was again combined with the phI b mutation in cv. Pavon 76 and a tertiary recombinant chromosome was recovered, labeled 1-96-1. This chromosome differs from 1-96 by the absence of the terminal A. elongatum segment that normally carries the Y locus. The translocated chromosome 1-96-1 has a normal 7DS arm, long (ca. 75%) proximal segment of 7DL, a homeologous segment from TEL of A. elongatum and a short terminal segment of 7DL (FIG. 1). Since the chromosome was produced by crossing over it is assumed to be fully compensating for normal 7D. No indications of reduced compensation have been observed.

After recovery, plants with chromosome 1-96-1 were backcrossed additional three times to cv. Pavon 76 and two sets of sister lines were isolated among progenies from self-pollinated BC3 heterozygotes: homozygotes for the 1-96-1 translocations and disomics of normal chromosomes 7D. These two are sister lines that differ by the presence/absence of the A. elongatum segment; disomics 7D serve as additional controls for the translocation lines. Overall, the recovered lines have eight backcrosses to Pavon 76; however, it needs to be taken into account that the phI b lines carry substantial and extensive genome rearrangements, and new ones are generated in each generation. There were only three backcrosses to normal Pavon 76 after the last round of the phI b-induced recombination. For this reason, additional controls in the form of sister lines are highly desirable. For simplicity, the line of cv. Pavon 76 homozygous for the 1-96-1 translocation will be referred to as TL (translocation line), original cv. Pavon 76 will be abbreviated as P76 while the sister lines of TL without the translocation will be called NC (negative control). Nulli-tetrasomics (NT) for the homoeologous group 7 as well as ditelosomics (Dt) lines of chromosome 7D in cv. Chinese spring were used to determine and verify the chromosome locations of various candidate genes.

Example 2—Cigar Roll Root Assays

For the early seedling stage root screening we used the cigar roll method (Zhu et al., 2006, TAG, 113:1-10). Similar sized seeds were germinated in a petri dish with moist paper towel for three days in the dark at 22-2S° C. Three seedlings per genotype were placed between two sheets of germination paper and rolled vertically. Three batches of 10 cigar rolls, totaling 30 plants per genotype were soaked in tap water and placed vertically in 1 L beaker filled with SO mL of water. Seedlings were grown in a controlled environment using a Percival Intellus Control System incubator (Model: I36VLC8) set at 25/27° C., 11.5/12.5 h day/night, 50/70% relative humidity and illumination of 80 μmols m⁻²sec⁻¹during the duration of the experiments (Percival Scientific, Inc., Iowa). Water was added to each beaker twice daily to maintain the volume of 50 ml. All measurements were carried until 6 days after germination. Measurements after Day 6 can potentially be affected by limiting seed resources that drive seedling growth. For gene expression experiments, seedlings were harvested at 2, 4 and 6 days after germination. Root tissue samples were collected and snap frozen.

Example 3—Greenhouse Experiments

Seeds were germinated in glass petri dishes in the dark at 25° C. Once the coleoptiles were approximately 1 cm, uniform seedlings were selected and transplanted to PVC pipes (1 m×15.5 cm; height×diameter; NDS Inc., Texas). Each pipe was lined with clear poly plastic bags (length×width; 153 cm×18.5 cm) (Uline, Tex.) and filled with approximately 9 Kg of fine silica sand (Lane Mountain Co., Valley, Wash.). A gap was maintained between the plastic bags and the inner wall of the pipes. Small holes were made at the side and bottom of the plastic bags as well as the pipes to provide adequate aeration and drainage. For the first week after transplant, each tube was watered daily with 100 mL. After the first week, the well-watered, control plants were supplied with 50 mL of tap water and 50 mL of half strength Hoagland solution twice weekly. For the limited-water treatment, each tube received 50 mL of half-strength Hoagland solution twice weekly. Each treatment consisted of seven replicates per genotype with five plants per tube/replicate (35 plants per treatment).

The pre-tillering stage experiment was done from July 2011 to October 2011. The greenhouse temperature was set between 26.7-32.2° C. during the day and 26.1-29.4° C. during the night, humidity ranges from 33%-73% and light period was between 0700-1800 hrs by Metal Halide Lamp 1000 watt bulbs (Philips Lighting Co., Somerset, N.J.). Using the LI-250A Light Meter, the average light reading is 215.8±44.5 μmol s⁻¹m⁻²(LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebr., USA).

Wheat roots were harvested 18 days after germination. The plastic sleeve was carefully removed from each tube and the plastic lining was cut gently to avoid root damage. Roots were gently removed from the sand column. Excess sand was removed using a paint brush with soft bristles. Root and shoot length were recorded. Root and shoot dry weights were determined after drying for 5 days at 60° C. Statistical analyses were done using the one-way ANOVA function using Tukey's method using R-Commander package for R (Fox, 2005, J. Statistical Software, 14).

Example 4—Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Photosynthesis and Gas Exchange Measurements

Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were recorded day 18 after transplant for each treatment on the leaf below the newest fully expanded leaf using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR 6400xt) equipped with a leaf chamber fluorometer (LI-COR 6400-40) (LI-COR Biosciences). The area of each leaf in the leaf chamber was determined and values entered manually into the system. Measurements were recorded between 1000 hrs-14:00 hrs. Reference CO₂levels were maintained at 400 μmol sec⁻¹and chamber flow was set at 500 μmol. Actinic light intensity was set at 1000 μmol with 10% blue LEDs. Maximal fluorescence values of light adapted leaves were obtained by saturating the leaf using a multiphase flash (Loriaux et al., 2006, Am. Soc. Plant Biol. Ann. Meet., Poster Presentation). The first phase consisted of an 8000 μmol pulse for 300 ms followed by a 100% ramp for 400 ms, and a second saturating flash of 8000 μmol for 300 ms. The maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′) was calculated using the equation: Fv′/Fm′=Fm′−Fo′/Fm′, where Fv′ refers to variable fluorescence, Fm′ is maximal fluorescence, Fo′ is minimum fluorescence, and Fs is the steady state fluorescence. Photochemical quenching (qP) was calculated using the equation: Fm′−Fs′/Fm′−Fo′. Non-photochemical quenching (qN) was determined using the equation: =Fm−Fm′/Fm−Fo′.

Example 5—A/Ci Curve with Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Gas exchange and fluorescence measurements were recorded for each replicate with the LI-COR 6400xt using PVC-cultured wheat plants on day 18 day. Instrument settings were identical to those described above. Six CO₂response curves per genotype were generated for each treatment. Gas exchange and fluorescence measurements were recorded at 13 CO₂flow rates (400, 300, 200, 100, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 800 μmol sec⁻¹). CO₂assimilation was plotted against intercellular CO₂(C_i) and the data points were fit to the equation of Farquhar et al. (1980, Planta, 149:78-90) using SAS and the methods described by Dubois et al. (2007, New Phytol., 176:402-14).

Example 6—RNA Isolation and RNA Cleanup

Eighteen days after transplanting, leaf and root tissues were collected and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction. RNA was extracted using the TRIzol method. RNA concentration was quantified (1:1000) with Beckman Coulter DU 730 Life Science UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, Calif.). RNA cleanup was performed according to RNeasy MinElute Cleanup kit protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.). The RNA was eluted with 15 μl RNase-free water along with on-column DNase1 treatment.

Example 7—First-Strand cDNA Synthesis and qRT-PCR Reaction

We used SuperScript VILO to synthesize cDNA for semi- and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, Calif.). First-strand cDNA was generated for the two-step qRT-PCR by following the protocol from Superscript VILO cDNA synthesis kit. An amount of 2 μg of RNA was used in the 20 μL reaction mixture. For the qPCR reaction, 4 μL of the diluted cDNA (1:20) was used in the 15 μL reaction mixture. In the qPCR reaction volume, 7.5 μL of iQ SYBR Green Supermix was used (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). The qRT-PCR was run using Roche LightCycle 480 II with the following parameter settings (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, Ind.): 95° C. pre-incubation for 10 mins, amplification was done for 45 cycles at 95° C. for 10 sec and 60° C. for 10 sec; the melting curve was set-up for 95° C., 65° C., 97° C.; cooling was set-up at 40° C. for 30 sec. Each qPCR run was performed with three independent tissue samples, each sample having two technical replicates. Two genes that showed stable expression values in a large set of microarray experiments across treatments and tissue samples were used as internal controls. A description of the genes and primer sequences is provided in Table 4. Crossing point value (Cp or Ct), which was the point at which the fluorescence crosses the threshold, and melting curve analyses were obtained using the LightCycler Roche 480 Software v1.5. The melting curve data was collected for all samples and genes to ensure a single peak, indicating amplification of specific region by a pair of primers.

Example 8—Microarray Data Analysis

Wheat Array GeneChip data was generated using standard Affymetrix protocol (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif.). Two independent biological replicates were used for array experiment. CEL files were analyzed using the limma package in the R software program. Briefly, the bioconductor ‘affy’ and ‘limma’ packages was used for reading CEL files and normalizing microarray data (Smyth, 2005, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor, Springer, New York, 397-420). The raw intensity values for the GeneChip arrays were background corrected, log₂-transformed and quantile normalized with robust multi array average (RMA) within the R package ‘affy’ (Irizarry et al., 2003, Biostatistics, 4:249-264). The statistical computation and assessment of differential expression was done with empirical Bayes function which moderates the standard errors of estimated log-fold changes toward a pooled standard deviation value. The p-values were adjusted to Benjamini and Hochberg's method (BH) to control the false discovery rate. The top table function was used to list the genes according to the specified p-value of 0.05, log 2 fold change of 1, and p-value adjust=BH. Probe set annotated was generated from HarvEST:WheatChip (Close et al., 2007, Methods Mol. Biol., 406:161-77). The raw array data is publically available through NCBI GEO (GSE42214). A complete list of differentially expressed transcripts is listed in Table 5.

TABLE 5

List of Differentially Expressed Genes

		Fold			Arabidopsis
Category	Probeset	Change	Rice Locus	Rice Description	Accession	Arabidopsis Description

Cell Wall	Ta.10287.1.A1_at	−2.99	LOC_Os03g18860.1	pectinesterase	AT4G02330	pectinesterase
	Ta.10848.1.S1_at	−2.75	LOC_Os06g51500.1		AT5G49720	ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA GLYCOSYL HYDROLASE 9A1;
						cellulase/hydrolase, hydrolyzing O-glycasyl compounds
	TaAffx.86606.1.S1_at	−2.12	LOC_Os09g25490.1	CESA9 cellulose synthase	AT5G17420	IRX3 (IRREGULAR XYLEM 3); cellulose synthase
	TaAffx.69760.1.S1_at	−1.76	LOC_Os08g01670.1	pectin methylesterase inhibitor	AT5G64620	pectinesterase inhibitor
	TaAffx.79853.1.S1_at	1.11	LOC_Os01g32100.1	protein transposon protein	AT2G15880	leucine-rich repeat family protein/extension family protein
	TaAffx.56769.1.S1_at	1.74	LOC_Os01g18080.1	retrotransposon protein	AT1G20130	hydrolase, acting on ester bonds/lipase/structrual constituent of cell wall
	Ta.30682.2.S1_at	2.48	LOC_Os08g17170.1	protein retrotransposon protein	AT4G18670	structural constituent of cell wall
	TaAffx.8948.1.S1_at	2.71	LOC_Os07g10770.1	CESA8-cellulose synthase	AT5G05170	CEV1 (CONSTITUTIVE EXPRESSION OF VSP 1);
						cellulose synthase/transferase
	Ta.9675.2.S1_at	3.12	LOC_Os01g57630.3		AT4G13340	leucine-rich repeat famlly protein/extension family protein
Signaling	Ta.5029.2.A1_at	−6.3	LOC_Os11g11890.1	protein kinase domain containing protein	AT4G23140	CRK6 (CYSTEINE-RICH RLK 6); kinase
	TaAffx.36786.1.S1_at	−2.38	LOC_Os04g12560.1	receptor-like protein kinase	AT5G60900	RLK1 (RECEPTOR LIKE PROTEIN KINASE1)
	TaAffx.8197.1.S1_at	−2.34	LOC_Os01g22590.1	retrotransposon protein	AT1G26150	PERK10 (PRONLINE-RICH EXTENSIN LIKE RECEPTOR KINASE 10);
						ATP binding/protein kinase/protein serine/threonine kinese/protein ty
	Ta.7164.3.S1_x_at	−1.66	LOC_Os01g23620.1		AT1G56330	ATSAR1B (SECRETION-ASSOCIATED RAS 1 B)
	TaAffx.79885.1.S1_at	−1.57	LOC_Os07g20544.2	aspartokinase	AT5G14760	CARAB-AK-LYS; aspartate kinese
	TaAffx.79349.1.S1_at	−1.47	LOC_Os08g09670.1	F-box/LRR-repeat protein 22	AT4G05470	F-box family protein (FBL21)
	TaAffx.61545.1.S1_at	−1.43	LOC_Os08g44350.1	histidine containing phosphotransfer protein	AT3G21510	AHP1 (HISTIDINE CONTAINING PHOSPHOTRANSMITTER 1);
						histidine phosphotransfer kinase
	TaAffx.108924.1.S1_at	−1.37	LOC_Os04g01070.1	protein transposon protein	AT1G26150	PERK10 (PROLINE-RICH EXTENSIN-LIKE RECEPTOR KINASE 10)
	Ta.10515.1.S1_at	1.06	LOC_Os04g44910.1	receptor like protein kinase	AT2G37710	RLK (receptor lectin kinase); kinase
	TaAffx.72133.3.S1_x_at	1.13	LOC_Os01g47430.2		AT1G29370	kinase related
	Ta.21202.1.S1_at	1.18	LOC_Os06g45660.1		AT1G31160	zinc-binding protein putative/protein kinase C inhibitor
	TaAffx.59697.1S1_at	1.2	LOC_Os03g64110.1	WD domain, G-beta repeat domain containing protein	AT1G70460	protein kinase
	TaAffx.86549.1.S1_at	1.21	LOC_Os06g07300.1	serine/threonine-protein kinase receptor	AT2G19130	S-locus lectin protein kinase family protein
	TaAffx.112930.1.S1_at	1.47	LOC_Os04g39040.1	cDNA UBA and UBX domain-containing protein	AT4G15410	PUX5 (Arabidopsis thaliana serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A
						55 kDa regulatory subunit B prime gamma)
	TaAffx.81496.1.S1_at	1.84	LOC_Or06g45630.1		AT1G71830	SERK1 (SOMATIC EMBROGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE 1)
	Ta.17605.1.S1_at	1.96	LOC_Os01g65230.1	ACG kinases include homologs to PKA, PKG and PKC
	Ta.22666.1.S1_at	2.24	LOC_Os01g66820.1	inactive receptor kinase At1g27190
	Ta.18480.1.S1_x_at	3	LOC_Os03g12250.1	atypical receptot-like kinase MARK	AT3G17840	RLK902; ATP binding/kinase/protein serine/threonine kinase
	TaAffx.83317.1.S1_at	−1.31	LOC_Os02g40180.1	cDNA receptor-like protein kinase 5 precursor,	AT5G16590	LRR1; ATP binding/linase/protein serine/threonine kinase
				putative expressed
Transcription	Ta.23792.1.S1_at	−3.92	LOC_Os06g43860.1	homeobox protein knotted-1	AT5G11060	KNAT4 (KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX GENE 4)
Factors	Ta.12700.1.S1_at	−1.68	LOC_Os05g11414.2	OsMADS58	AT4G18960	AG (AGAMOUS)
	Ta.13267.1.S1_at	−1.05	LOC_Os06g50310.1	E2F-related protein	AT4G35040	bZIP transcription factor family protein
	TaAffx.52152.1.S1_at	1.06	LOC_Os02g36880.4	No apical meristem protein	AT5G61430	ANAC100 (ARABIDOPSIS NAC DOMAIN CONTAINING PROTEIN 100)
	Ta.3395.2.S1_at	1.43	LOC_Os06g06750.1	MADS-box family gene with MIKCc type-box	AT1G24260	SEP3 (SEPALLATA3)
	TaAffx.24919.2.S1_at	1.77	LOC_Os09g31390.1		AT5G06839	bZIP family transcription factor
	TaAffx.58172.1.S1_at	2.05	LOC_Os01g09800.1	BTBA1-Bric-a-Bac, Tramtrack, Broad	AT1G64280	NPR1(NONEXPRESSER OF PR GENES 1)
				Complex BTB domain
				with Ankyrin repeat region
	TaAffx.58412.1.S1_at	1.54	LOC_Os09g28210.1	cDNA bHelix-loop-helix transcription factor
	TaAffx.143995.9.S1_at	−1.09	LOC_Os01g44230.1	transcription factor X1, putative, expressed	AT3G48670	XH/XS dormain containing protein/XS zinc finger domain containing protein
	TaAffx.128836.1.S1_x_at	−7.79	LOC_Os01g44230.2	transcription factor X1	AT4G00380	XH/XS dormain containing protein/XS zinc finger domain containing protein
Protein	TaAffx.93139.1.A1_at	−3.04	LOC_Os09g35690.1	cDNA zinc RING finger protein	AT3G63530	BB (BIG BROTHER); ubiquitin-protein ligase
Degradation	TaAffx.37159.2.S1_x_at	−2.72			AT5G03240	UBQ3 (POLYUBIQUITIN 3)
	TaAffx.37159.2.S1_at	−2.2			AT5G03240	UBQ3 (POLYUBIQUITIN 3)
	TaAffx.86073.1.S1_at	−1.72	LOC_Os01g66330.1	cDNA ATP-dependent Clp protease
				ATP-binding subunit clpX
	Ta.5004.2.S1_at	−1.6	LOC_Os11g14900.5	thiol protease SEN102 precursor	AT3G48340	cysteine-type endopeptidase
	TaAffx.85253.1.S1_at	−1.51	LOC_Os02g27360.2	aspartic proteinase-like protein 2	AT1G05840	aspartyl protease family protein
	Ta.17659.1.S1_x_at	1.21	LOC_Os01g60410.2	cDNA ubliquitin-conjugating enzyme	AT4G27960	UBC9 (UBIQUITIN CONJUGATING ENZYME 9); ubiquitin-protein ligase
Other	Ta.16236.1.S1_at	−7.98	LOC_Os06g19800.1	BURP domain containing protein	AT5G25610	RD22; nutrient reservoir
	TaAffx.28894.2.S1_at	−2.72	LOC_Os02g09400.1	cytochrome P450	AT3G26280	CYP71B4; electron carrier/heme binding/iron ion
						binding/monooxygenase/oxygen binding
	Ta.14009.1.A1_at	−2.37	LOC_Os04g59480.1	POT family protein	AT1G22540	proton-dependent oligopeptide transport (POT) family protein
	TaAffx.112673.1.S1_at	−2.32	LOC_Os03g17470.1	IN2-1 protein	AT3G55040	GSTL2
	Ta.23822.1 S1_at	−2.21	LOC_Os08g01510.1	cytochrome P450	AT1G13080	CYP71B2 (CYTOCHROME P450 71B2) electron carrier/heme binding/iron
						ion binding/monooxygenase/oxygen binding
	Ta.5309.3.S1_at	−2.07	LOC_Os04g39440.3	ras-related protein	AT4G17170	RABB1C (ARABIDOPSIS RAB GTPASE HOMOLOG B1C)
	Ta.7164.3.S1_at	−2.02	LOC_Os01g23620.1		AT2G56330	ATSAR1B (SECRETION-ASSOCIATED RAS 1 B)
	Ta.17303.1._a_at	−1.92	LOC_Os12g37419.1	cytochrome coxidase polypeptide Vc	AT2G47380	cytochrome c oxidase subunit Vc family protein/COX5C family protein
	TaAffx.120526.2.S1_at	−1.76	LOC_Os07g31770.1	chalcone synthase	AT5G13930	TT4 TRANSPARENT TESTA 4); naringenin-chalcone synthase
	TaAffx.8336.1.S1_at	−1.69	LOC_Os03g10510.1	outer mitochondrial membrane porin	AT5G67500	VDAC2 (VOLTAGE DEPENDENT ANION CHANNEL 2)
	Ta.23979.1.A1_at	−1.54	LOC_Os01g73170.1	peroxidase precursor	AT1G71695	peroxidase 12 (PER12)
	Ta.23663.1.A1_at	−1.29	LOC_Os01g04360.1	hsp20/alpha crystallin family protein	AT5G59720	HSP18.2 (heat shock protein 18.2)
	TaAf fx.120375 I._at	−1.23	LOC_Os05g04120.1	ferroportinq domain containing protein	AT5G26820	ATIREG3 (IRON REGULATED PROTEIN 3)
	TaAffx.52969.1.S1_at	−1.22	LOC_Os04g42100.1		AT3G19430	late embryogenesis abundant protein-related
	TaAffx.112558.1.S1_at	−1.22	LOC_Os08g42010.1	nodulin, putative expressed	AT5G14120	nodulin family protein
	Ta.13250.3.S1_at	1.31	LOC_Os06g09688.1	chaperonin, putative	AT5G20720	CPN20 (CHAPERONIN 20)
	TaAffx.86941.1.S1_at	1.37	LOC_Os10g07534.1	disease resistance protein RPM1	AT1G59780	disease resistance protein (CC-NBS-LRR class)
	Ta.15986.1.S1_at	1.52	LOC_Os05g04700.1	OsRCl2-6	AT3G05880	RCI2A (RARE COLD INDUCIBLE 2A)
	TaAffx.86014.1.S1_at	1.7	LOC_Os05g48020.1	SNARE domain containing protein	AT3G09740	SYP71 (SYNTAXIN OF PLANTS 71)
	Ta.2395715.1.S1_at	1.76	LOC_Os08g41880.1	nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase	AT5G50400	PAP27 (PURPLE ACID PHOSPHATASE 27)
	TaAffx.57715.1.S1_at	1.9	LOC_Os12g42230.1	transketolase	AT2G34590	transketolase family protein
	Ta.20911.2.A1_at	1.92	LOC_Os03g17174.1	Psbp	AT2G39470	PPL2 (PsbP-like protein 2)
	Ta.14590.3.S1_at	1.96	LOC_Os06g11800.1	annexin	AT5G10230	ANNAT7 (ANNEXIN ARABIDOPSIS 7)
	TaAffx.57167.1.S1._at	2.03	LOC_Os01g43390.1	uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase	AT3G14930	HEME1
	Ta.15865.1.A1_at	2.31	LOC_Os03g12260.1	cytochrome P450 protein	AT3G56630	CYP94D2; electron carrier/heme binding/iron ion
						binding/monooxygenase/oxygen binding
	Ta.17367.1.S1_at	2.31	LOC_Os05g13390.1		AT1G66240	ATX1 (ARABIDOPSIS HOMOLOG OF ANTI-OXIDANT 1)
	Ta 4978.2.A1_a_at	2.32			AT4G11430	hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family protein
	TaAffx.85805.1.S1_s_at	2.36	LOC_Os05g06500.1	universal stress protein domain containing protein	AT3G17020	universal stress protein (USP) family protein
	TaAffx.98251.1.S1_at	2.55	LOC_Os03g37120.1		AT4G19430	late embryogenesis abundant protein-related/LEA protein-related
	Ta.27016.1.A1_x_at	2.7	LOC_Os01g27230.1	12-oxophytodienoate reductase	AT1G76690	OPR2
Hormone	Ta.3576.1 S1_at	−1.33	LOC_Os06g51330.2		AT4G09610	GASA2 (GAST1 PROTEIN HOMOLOG 2)
	TaAffx.113441.1.S1_at	−2.89	LOC_Os12g43130.1	phytoene synthase, chloroplast precursor	AT5G17230	phytoene synthase (PSY)
	Ta.23392.2.S1_x_at	1.05	LOC_Os03g09900.1		AT5G35735	auxin-responsive family protein
Metabolism	Ta.6293.1.A1_at	−5.18	LOC_Os08g29650.1		AT4G35785	nucleic acid binding/nucleotide binding
	Ta 22589.1.S1_at	−2.34	LOC_Os02g51930.1	cytokinin-O-glucosyltransferase 2	AT1G78270	AtUGT85A4 (UDP-glucosyl transferase 85A4)
	TaAffx.824901.S1_at	−2.31	LOC_Os01g48960.1	glutamate synthase, chloroplast precursor	AT5G53460	GLT1; glutamate synthase (NADH)
	TaAffx.53860.1.S1_at	−1.85	LOC_Os03g52840.1	serine hydroxymethyltransferase mitochondrial precursor	AT4G37930	SHM1 (SERINE TRANSHYDROXYMETHYL TRANSFERASE 1)
	Ta.1291.1.A1_x_at	−1.65	LOC_Os01g71670.1	glycosyl hydrolases family 17	AT3G57270	BG1 (BETA-1,3-GLUCANASE 1)
	TaAffx.87056.1.S1_at	−1.63	LOC_Os06g14810.1	3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase	AT1G25450	KCS5 (3-KETOACYL-COA SYNTNASE 5); fatty acid elongase
	TaAffx.55916.2.S1_at	−1.34	LOC_Os04g46930.2	protein serine racemase	AT4G11640	ATSR (ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA SERINE RACEMASE)
	TaAffx.5829.1.S1_at	−1.16	LOC_Os11g42510.1	tyrosine aminotransferase	AT2G20610	SUR1 (SUPERROOT 1); S-alkylthiohydroximate lyase
	TaAffx.65466.1.S1_at	1.13	LOC_Os02g49920.1	3-ketoacyl CoA synthase	AT1G25450	KCS5 (3-KETOACYL-COA SYNTNASE 5); fatty acid elongase
	Ta.30535.1.S1_at	1.45	LOC_Os03g11050.3	mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase	AT3G74910	ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase family protein
	TaAffx.57742.1.S1_at	1.66	LOC_Os06g09450.8	sucose synthase	AT3G43190	SUS4; UDP-glycosyltransferase/sucrose synthase
	TaAffx.56059.1.S1_at	2.25	LOC_Os02g47090.1	peptide transporter PTR2	AT1G32450	NRT1.5 (NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1.5)

Example 9—Construction of the Co-Expression Network

The co-expression network was constructed with RiceNet using rice orthologous information from HarvEST:Wheat for differentially expressed transcripts between P76 and TL under limited-water conditions (Lee et al., 2011, PNAS USA, 108:1-6). Genes corresponding to ribosomal proteins were removed to reduce the occurrence of false relationships between otherwise non-connected genes. Primers for the genes identified from the network analysis and validated with quantitative PCR are listed in Table 4 and their expression is summarized in Table 6.

TABLE 4

Genes and Primer Sequences

(A)

	Arabidopsis	Left Primer	Right Primer	Product Size
Probeset ID	Gene Annotation	(5′ to 3′)	(5′ to 3′)	(bp)	SEQ ID NO

TaAffx.81496.1.S1_at	SERK1	CCTCCTGAGATTGGCACATT	GCATTGTGCCACTGAACTTG	163	12, 13

Ta.23792.1.S1_at	KNAT3	CCTTCAAGGAACAGCTCCAG	CTCTCACTGTCGACCGGATT	166	14, 15

Ta.13267.1.S1_at	E2f	GTCATGAGTGGCCAGGTTTT	GCCAATAGTCTCTCGCAAGG	157	16, 17

TaAffx.8948.1.S1_at	CESA3	TTGTGCTGCGATTGATTGTT	TAAGTCTCCCGGTTGATTGG	169	18, 19

Ta.6862.2.S1_at	BRI-1	TGTTCAAGCCTCAACAGACG	TTGCCAACAAGAAACAACCA	229	20, 21

Ta.9047.2.S1_a_at	GH9B7	GGTGGAATTCTCTGCAGCAT	AGCTTCATTGGGTTGTCACC	155	22, 23

Ta.856.1.S1_at	ERL1	GCATTCATGGTGTGGATCAG	ATGGGGTTCGATCAATTCAA	186	24, 25

Ta.4385.1.S1_at	CTL1	ACCAGACCATCACCGACTTC	GCCGTATCCACATGAGGTCT	230	26, 27

Ta.1804.1.S1_s_at	COB1	CAAGCTCTCATGTCGTGGAA	ACACAGCTTCCTGGACGAGT	167	28, 29

TaAffx_8566_1_S1_at	PP2C	TGCTAGCAGGAGGTTGGATT	TCCCTGTTTCTTGGTCCTTG	150	30, 31

TaAffx_79349_1_S1_at	FBL21	CACTGCTAATTCGCTCACCA	CAGCATGGTCTCGGAATTTT	210	32, 33

Ta_18480_1_S1_x_at	RLK902	CAGAAGGCCGACGTCTACAG	ACCATCTCCTCCTCCACGTT	195	34, 35

Internal Control 4	—	CCCTGGTTTGAGCAAGTCAT	AGTCGTGACTGAAGGGGTTG	160	36, 37

Internal Control 8	—	TGAGGTTGTCAAGCAACAGG	CATAAGACCAGCCCAAGCAT	152	38, 39

(B)

	Arabidopsis	Left Primer	Right Primer	Product Size
Probeset ID	Gene Annotation	(5′ to 3′)	(5′ to 3′)	(bp)	SEQ ID NO

Ta.23792.1.S1_at	KNAT3	CGTCTACCCTGAAAGCTTGG	CCTCACCTGCATTGTTCCTT	207	40, 41

TaAffx.81496.1.S1_at	SERK1	GACGGCTTCACCGTCATATT	AGCAGCTACGGCATCAGAAT	223	42, 43

Ta.9675.2.S1_at	LRX	AATCGTACAACCACCCAAGC	ATTGTAGCACTTGGCGTCAG	238	44, 45

Ta.14590.3.S1_at	Annxn	GTCAACACAAGGTTGGCTCA	AGCCTTGAGATCCTTGGTGA	170	46, 47

(C)

	Name used	Left Primer	Right Primer	Product Size
Probeset ID	in Manuscript	(5′ to 3′)	(5′ to 3′)	(bp)	SEQ ID NO

Ta.28144.1.S1_at	Ta.28144	AGTATCTGCATCCACCTCGAC	CTGGCATCCACCTTCTTCTT	153	48, 49

Ta.7772.1.S1_at	Ta.7772	CGTTAATGAGACCGCTTTCC	GATCAGCAATCCAGCATTCA	199	50, 51

Ta.16810.1.S1_at	Ta.16810	CAGATGGTTCGTTCGGTGAT	AGCAGAGAGCAACGGAAAAC	261	52, 53

TABLE 6

pRT-PCR Analysis of Network Associated Genes

		Relative	Stan-
		Expres-	dard
Rice Locus	Wheat Probe	sion	Error

SERK1	LOC_Os06g45630.1	TaAffx.81496.1.S1_at	1.5	0.2
FBL21	LOC_Os08g09670	TaAffx.79349.1.S1_at	0.2	0.05
LRR1	LOC_Os02g40180	TaAffx.83317.1.S1_at	3.2	1.09
PP2C	LOC_Os07g32380	TaAffx.8566.1.S1_at	N/A	N/A
BRI1	LOC_Os02g09359	Ta.6862.2.S1_at	2.2	0.20
CESA3	LOC_Os07g10770	TaAffx.8948.1.S1_at	6.1	3.19
COB	LOC_Os05g32110	Ta.1804.1.S1_s_at	11.0	4.60
CTL1	LOC_Os09g32080	Ta.4385.1.S1_at	2.2	0.63
ERL	LOC_Os06g03970	Ta.856.1.S1_at	N/A	N/A
GH9B7	LOC_Os09g36350	Ta.9047.2.S1_a_at	6.0	1.57

CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA3),
CHITINASE-LIKE1 (CTL1),
COBRA1 (COB1),
RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE902 (RLK902),
GLYCOSYL HYDROLASE 9B7 (GH9B7),
BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1),
PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2C (PP2C),
ERECTA-LIKE1 (ERL1),
SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE1 (SERK1),
F-BOX21 (FBL21), and
LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT (LRR1)

Example 10—SFP Identification and In Silico Mapping of Candidate Genes

Microarray data were preprocessed as described above. To eliminate probe sets with absent transcripts, we adopted the procedure suggested by Schuster et al. (2007, Genome Biol., 8:R125) making “present” and “absent” calls for each probe set. A probe set was retained and used for SFP detection if it had present calls in all biological replicates of the two genotypes under comparison. We used robustified projection pursuit (RPP) method for SFP detection (Cui et al., 2005, Bioinformatics, 21:3852-8) through pair-wise comparison among parent genotype P76, TL and NC for all samples. For each comparison, we used an arbitrary cutoff value of 10 for calling SFP-containing probe sets, within which a probe will be identified as a SFP probe if it accounts for more than 40% of overall outlying score of its residing probe set.

Primers were designed so that the region flanking each probe were amplified. Sequences were amplified from cDNA using the primers listed in Table 4 using PCR. A 25 μL reaction was prepared using GoTAQ green master mix (Promega) consisting of 1 μL each of forward and reverse primer at 10 μM and 2 μL of cDNA. Sequences were amplified using the following program: denaturation at 94° C. for 3 min followed by 30 cycles of amplification (30 sec at 94° C., 30 sec at 58° C., 30 sec at 72° C.) and a final temperature of 72° C. for 7 min. Prior to cloning each reaction was purified using GeneJET™ PCR Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific). Amplicons were cloned into PGEM T Easy Vector (Promega) and JMI09 competent cells were transformed and cultured according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cultures were plated on LB plates supplemented with 100 μg ampicillin and X-Gal-IPTG. Plasmids were retrieved using GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Thermo Scientific) and sequenced.

Example 11—PCR-Based Mapping of Genes to Wheat Chromosome 7D

A subset of microarray genes that were mapped through the SFP analysis to 7DL using rice-wheat synteny maps were confirmed using a series of nullisomic-tetrasomic and ditelosomic Chinese Spring wheat lines (Devos et al., 1999, Cereal Res. Commun., 27:231-9; Sorrells et al., 2003, Genome Res., 13:1818-27). Primers specific to 7DL were designed using probe set sequences obtained from HarvEST WheatChip version 1.59, Grain Genes (wheat.pw.usda.gov/ on the World Wide Web) and NCBI BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997, Nucl. Acids Res., 25:3389-402; Close et al., 2007, Methods Mol. Biol., 406:161-77). The selected 7D sequences were used to design primers using Primer3 software (Rozen, 2000, Methods Mol. Biol., 132:365-86). PCR was performed to map the genes using genomic DNA from Chinese spring, nullisomic-tetrasomic and ditelosomic 7DL and 7DS Chinese Spring wheat plants. PCR was performed using the following settings: 95° C. pre-incubation for 3 mins., amplification was done for 40 cycles at 95° C. for 30 sec and 58° C. for 30 sec and 72° C. for 1 min, and extension at 72° C. for 3 mins. The PCR products were run on a 2% agarose gel molecular biology grade (Benchmark Scientific, Edison, N.J.) and imaged using BioDoc-IT Imaging system UV Transillumator (UVP, LLC, Upland, Calif.).

Example 12—Agropyron Translocation Introduces an Adaptive Root Response in Wheat

It was hypothesized that the differences in biomass and yield between the Agropyron 7DL lines and the corresponding parental genotypes could be due to increased investment in root production, thus increasing acquisition of water and nutrients from the soil. We used a parent line, Pavon76 (P76), the 1-96-1 translocation line (TL), and a negative control (NC) for the translocation event for these experiments (FIG. 1). The total number of lateral roots (>1 mm) on the primary root axis were counted, and lateral root density was calculated by dividing the number of lateral roots on the primary root axis by the primary root length. Statistical significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA using Tukeys method.

TL exhibited longer primary roots at 4 days and 6 days when compared to the control genotypes (P76 and NC) (p<0.05, Table 1, Table 4). Seminal roots of TL were longer at 2, 4 and 6 days when compared to P76 and NC (p<0.01, Table 1). TL line produced significantly more lateral roots on the primary root axis at 4 and 6 days. A significant increase in lateral root density was also observed in TL at 4 and 6 days (p<0.05). During the preliminary experiments to optimize the cigar roll method, it was observed that the increased root number in TL was inducible only under a mild water stress. No significant differences were observed under adequate access to water. Collectively, these observations suggested that presence of 7DL.7EL segment in the Pavon background could be conferring an adaptive root response under water limitation in the translocation line. The early seedling root phenotyping prompted investigation of the differences in root architecture in older plants.

TABLE 1

Phenotypic evaluation of early seedling root system

	2 days	4 days	6 days

Lateral Root Number (primary root axis)

P76	nd	1.3 ± 0.6	8.8 ± 1.9
TL	nd	5.1 ± 0.8	27.6 ± 2.3
NC	nd	1.2 ± 0.6	8.8 ± 1.1

Primary Root Length (mm)

P76	7.2 ± 0.2	14.1 ± 1.0**	18.7 ± 1.9***
TL	7.2 ± 0.7	18.2 ± 0.9	27.5 0.6
NC	7.4 ± 0.3	14.4 ± 0.4*	19.5 ± 0.6***

Lateral Root Density (mm−1)

P76	nd	0.09 ± 0.03*	9.47 ± 0.08***
TL	nd	0.28 ± 0.05	1.00 ± 0.08
NC	nd	0.08 ± 0.04*	0.44 ± 0.05***

***= p ≤ 0.001,
**= p ≤ 0.005 and
*= p ≤ 0.05.
The ± represent standard error.
nd = not detected.
This method was repeated three times using 30 wheat seedlings per cultivar per experiment.

Example 13—TL Lines have Higher Shoot and Root Biomass Under Limited Water Condition

To observe the effect of the 1-96-1 translocation on root and shoot phenotypes at pre-tillering stage, we sampled plants at 18 days after germination. The lengths were measured at the time of harvest while the shoot and root dry mass were weighed separately after five days incubation on 60° C. chamber. Statistical significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA using Tukeys method.

Under water stress, TL had higher root (p≤0.01) and shoot (p≤0.001) biomass compared to P76 and NC (FIG. 2, Table 2). Moreover, under limited-water conditions, the shoot and root lengths of TL were greater than those of P76 and NC. Under well-watered conditions, there were no differences in root and shoot lengths and dry weights among genotypes. The phenotypic measurements indicate that the 1-96-1 translocation alters root traits under water-limiting conditions.

TABLE 2

Summary of shoot and root lengths and biomasses of spring wheat

Shoot

Root

Genotype	Well-watered	Limited-water	Well-watered	Limited-watered

Dry Weight (mg)

P76	366.6 ± 57.8	209.5 ± 30.0	343.6 ± 56.1	192.2 ± 18.2
TL	327.0 ± 51.5	336.4 ± 53.1**	335.7 ± 81.0	290.2 ± 44.4***
NC	320.9 ± 16.9	219.5 ± 30.5	318.9 ± 54.1	206.7 ± 39.4

Length (cm)

P76	35.2 ± 13.1	24.8 ± 2.0	76.2 ± 6.8	71.1 ± 3.8
TL	26.1 ± 2.3	27.5 ± 2.8	75.6 ± 4.0	79.6 ± 7.0*
NC	27.6 ± 3.0	26.3 ± 1.9	79.8 ± 10.6	78.4 ± 2.9

***= p ≤ 0.001 and
*= p ≤ 0.01.
The ± represent standard error.
This method was repeated three times using 35 wheat plants per cultivar per experiment.

Example 14—Stomatal Factors Limit Photosynthesis in P76 and NC During Water Deficit

To elucidate the physiological impact of higher root biomass in TL during water stress, the CO₂assimilation and gas exchange rates were measured for the three genotypes. Carbon assimilation was different among the three genotypes under limited-water conditions (FIG. 3). Photosynthetic rates were reduced by 45% and 46% in P76 and NC (p<0.001), respectively, but did not change significantly in TL (FIG. 3A, 3B, 3C). Water deficit also severely impacted stomatal conductance and transpiration, reducing stomatal conductance (g_s) by 50% and 56% and transpiration rate (E) by 39% and 49% compared to well-watered conditions in P76 and NC, respectively. Stomatal conductance was also reduced (p=0.001) in TL, but only by 16%. No reductions in transpiration were observed for TL during water deficit. Clearly, TL showed lower sensitivity to water limitation compared to P76 and NC.

Reductions in gas exchange and carbon assimilation are common in drought stressed plants due to decrease in stomatal aperture. However other aspects of photosynthesis such as light utilization and photosynthetic electron transport can also be impacted by drought stress. Therefore, we also measured chlorophyll fluorescence at the pre-tillering stage. Calculation of maximum quantum efficiency of open PSII reaction centers (Fv′/Fm′) and the amount of energy used to drive photosynthesis (photochemical quenching; qP) or dissipated as heat (non-photochemical quenching; qN) from fluorescence data is described herein. In well-watered conditions, no differences in Fv′/Fm′, qP or qN were observed among the genotypes (FIG. 3D, 3E, 3F). Photochemical quenching (qP) increased under limited-water by 12% and 9% in P76 and NC, respectively, but not in TL.

In addition to stomatal aperture and photosynthetic electron transport, biochemical components of carbon assimilation such as the carboxylation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) or the rate at which RuBP is regenerated, contribute to the photosynthetic capacity of a plant. To assess whether biochemical factors were contributing to the decline in CO₂assimilation (Pn) in P76, NC, and TL during water deficits, photosynthesis was measured at a series of CO₂concentrations and plotted against intercellular CO₂and the maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco (Vcmax) and the rate of electron transport (Jmax) were calculated according to the methods outlined by Dubois et al. (2007, New Phytologist, 176:402-14). Under limited water conditions, Jmax declined significantly by 31% and 24% in P76 and NC respectively (FIG. 4, Table 3), but did not change in TL. Vcmax was reduced by 31% in P76; however, it increased in TL by 18%. Although a 7% reduction in Vcmax was observed in NC, the difference was not significant. The results suggest that the major cause of photosynthetic decline in P76 and NC during water stress could be RuBp regeneration rate.

TABLE 3

Carboxylation rate of Rubisco and RuBP regeneration rate

Well-watered

Limited-water

	P76	Tl	NC	P76	TL	NC

Vcmax	69.6 ± 3.8	63.1 ± 2.6	64.4 ± 4.1	50.1 ± 2.1*	74.9 ± 2.7	59.8 ± 4.7
Jmax	93.9 ± 4.7	90.6 ± 4.1	83.2 ± 3.9	64.3 ± 2.3*	90.8 ± 2.2	63.0 ± 2.5*
Ri	0.86	0.90	0.86	0.92	0.95	0.92

*denotes statistically differences.

Example 15—TL Line Differentially Regulates Genes Associated with Root Architecture

To elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the increased root biomass phenotype observed in the TL line during water stress, we analyzed the root transcriptome of the three genotypes at pre-tillering stage (18 d) under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. A list of differentially expressed genes from various comparisons is provided as Table 5. Several genes known to play a role in root development were differentially expressed between the TL and P76/NC lines in limited water samples. One of these genes is a wheat ortholog of KNOTTED-like homeobox gene 3 in Arabidopsis (KNAT3). The wheat ortholog of KNAT3 was down-regulated in TL line compared to P76 and NC under limited water conditions (FIG. 5). In Arabidopsis, KNAT3 has been proposed to act as a negative regulator of lateral root development (Truernit et al., 2006, Plant Mol. Biol., 60:1-20; Truernit and Haseloff, 2007, Plant Signaling Behav., 2:10-2). In wheat, the differences in the expression level of the wheat KNAT3 ortholog among the genotypes was notable in the context of increased lateral root formation in TL under water stress. Transcript abundance in early seedlings was lower (p≤0.05) at 4 d in TL compared to P76 and NC (FIG. 5A). At 6 d after germination, the wheat KNAT3 ortholog was down-regulated by 5-fold in TL compared to Pavon at 2 d, while expression was slightly up-regulated in both P76 and NC when compared to P76 at 2 d. No genotypic differences were observed at 2 days after germination.

A wheat E2F-related transcription factor is down-regulated by −1.0 fold in TL under water limited conditions compared to P76 (FIG. 5). The E2F expression is lower in TL by 2.5-fold compared to the NC line. E2F proteins are a family of transcription factors that regulate cell cycle progression in plants and animals. In Arabidopsis, E2Fc is known to play an antagonistic role in cell division and is a negative regulator of lateral root formation (del Pozo et al., 2002, Plant Cell, 14:3057-71; Ramirez-Parra et al., 2004, Plant Cell, 16:2350-63). We validated the expression of E2F using qPCR in pre-tillering stage and early seedling stage plants (FIG. 5B, 5D). E2F expression was reduced under water stress in the three genotypes during pre-tillering stage. However, transcript abundance of E2F in TL was repressed by 1.2-fold, compared to less than 1-fold decrease in P76 and NC when compared to corresponding well-watered plants. The expression patterns of E2F in seedling roots was significantly repressed (p<0.05) in TL compared to P76 and NC at 4 d and 6 d (FIG. 5B).

Example 16—Expression of E2F in Seedling Roots Did not Change Significantly in the P76 and NC Under Water Stress

Expression of Somatic Embryogensis Receptor Kinase1 (SERKI), a member of the leucine-rich repeat, receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK) family, was notable among the differentially expressed genes among the genotypes during water stress. Wheat ortholog of SERKI in Arabidopsis was up-regulated by 1.8-fold in TL under water-limitation compared to P76 in the array experiment (FIG. 5C, 5E). Expression of SERKI in TL was 3-fold higher than NC under water stress. SERKI plays a critical role in root differentiation in response to auxin in addition to being involved in somatic embryogenesis and gamete (Walker, 1994, Plant Mol. Biol., 26:1599-609; Schmidt et al., 1997, Dev., 124:2049-62; Somleva et al., 2000, Plant Cell Rep., 19:718-26; Hecht et al., 2001, Plant Physiol., 127:803-16). Higher expression of SERKI in TL relative to the P76 and NC was validated by qPCR in roots of pre-tillering plants. SERK I expression was significantly induced in 4 d and 6 d TL seedling roots but not in P76 and NC (FIG. 5C). In summary, our transcriptome analysis identified several differentially regulated genes that could directly or indirectly be associated with the 1-96-1 translocation. We have focused on a relatively small subset of genes for further characterization based on their role growth and development in model species.

Example 17—Role of Brassinosteroids in Shaping Root System Architecture Emerges from Gene Network Analysis

To further extract root-associated genetic components involved in the water stress response from our list of differentially expressed microarray genes, we used the wheat-rice orthologous relationships to generate gene regulatory networks using a computational approach. Gene networks were constructed using the recently developed tool RiceNet to determine putative relationships among genes and predict root trait associated genes (Lee et al., 2011, PNAS USA, 108:1-6). This approach is likely to uncover some genes that are expected to be missed in transcriptome analysis due to low expression levels or lack of representation on the wheat array. RiceNet combines functional genomics, proteomics and comparative genome-scale datasets from diverse organisms to predict functional relationships among genes using a Bayesian log likelihood scoring (LLS) method (Lee et al., 2011, PNAS USA, 108:1-6). Comparisons of root transcriptome of P76 and TL under limited water conditions resulted in the identification of the 384 differentially expressed wheat transcripts. Of these, 224 were assigned to corresponding rice loci. After removal of duplicate loci, a list of 202 genes was queried in RiceNet, resulting in the construction of nine networks from 58 connected genes. Fifty genes were not found in RiceNet, while an additional 94 genes remained unlinked to other genes in the input set. We selected candidate genes with a LSS score >2.0 with particular focus on genes associated with regulation of cell division, growth and root development.

We found a network populated by genes that are either induced by brassinosteroids (BR) or are directly involved in the BR signaling, indicating a possible role of BR in regulating root system architecture (FIG. 6). This network consists of six genes identified during microarray analysis and five predicted genes. The network includes a component of the BR receptor complex BRI1. Although BRI1 was not identified from our microarray analysis, similarly to SERKI, its expression was also up-regulated in TL compared to P76 under water limited conditions in our real-time PCR assays (FIG. 6 and Table 6). This is consistent with the role of BR in promoting cell wall loosening, root elongation and lateral root development (Mussig et al., 2003, Plant Physiol., 133:1261-71; Bao et al., 2004, Plant Physiol., 134:1624-31; Wolf et al., 2012, Sci. Signal., 4:ra29). During the early seedling stage, expression of network members, CESA3 and SERKI was higher in TL at 4 and 6 days compared to P76 and NC. Differences in the lateral root production were also observed at these time points in TL relative to the other two genotypes. The BR gene regulatory network identified from our analysis yielded other members that are listed in Table 6. Several of these genes have been previously reported to have root specific phenotypes in when their expression is altered in mutants and/or transgenic plants in model species.

Example 18—In Silico Mapping of Root Related Genes to 7DL of Wheat

We next explored if the root related differentially expressed genes identified from the microarray analysis between TL and P76 and NC map to the 7DL translocation. We used the wheat array transcriptome dataset to mine for polymorphisms between TL and P76 and the NC using the single feature polymorphism analysis (SFP) (Cui et al., 2005, Bioinformatics, 21:3852-8; Walia et al., 2007, BMC Genomics, 8:87; Kim et al., 2009, BMC Plant Biol., 9:65). Distribution of the SFP probe sets between TL and P76 on the rice genome based on sequence alignment is shown in FIG. 7. The syntenic regions of wheat 7DL region correspond to the rice chromosomes 6 and 8 (Sorrells et al., 2003, Genome Res., 13:1818-27). Six SFP markers clustered to a region on the distal end of chromosome 6 in rice (FIG. 7). Another potential cluster was observed on

rice chromosomes

5 and 8, with three SFPs mapped to each cluster. We selected three predicted SFPs from the chromosome 6 cluster, which is syntenic to wheat chromosome 7D for validation by sequencing the PCR amplicons covering the region around the individual SFP probe. We were able to confirm the polymorphic probe sequences for these three probe sets (FIG. 8).

We then tested if rice orthologs of previously identified genes with predicted root related functions map to the chromosome 6 region in the SFP cluster. Both the KNAT3 ortholog and SERKI map to the cluster of SFP markers outlined by the grey box in FIG. 7, while E2F mapped to a region closer to the telomere of chromosome 6. Mapping results suggest that these genes are likely located on the 7DL.7EL translocation. We confirmed the genomic locations of the KNAT3 ortholog and SERKI in wheat using genomic DNA from a subset of ditelosomic and nullisomic-tetrasomic genetic stocks. The set includes six nulli-tetrasomic lines, which lack chromosome 7 for a given genome (A, B or D) and carries four copies of a corresponding homeologous chromosome of another genome, and two ditelosomic lines in which one chromosome pair is composed entirely of either short or long arms. SERKI and the KNAT3 ortholog mapped to 7DL (FIG. 9). Although E2F mapped to the distal segment of rice chromosome 6 in the SFP analysis, we were unable to PCR amplify the transcript in wheat for confirmation.

Part B Example 19—Identification of Genes Associated with the Agropyron Introgression

Bread wheat is a hexaploid and has seven homoeologous groups of chromosomes, derived from A, B and D progenitor genomes (Sears, 1969, Ann. Rev. Cytogenet., 3:451-68). Several stress tolerance genes have been introduced into wheat through alien introgressions, which are tolerated due to hexaploid buffering (Gill et al., 2011, PNAS USA, 108:7657-8). One such alien introgression from Agropyron elongatum was used to improve leaf rust resistance (Sharma and Knott, 1966, Canadian J. Genet. Cytol., 8:137-43). This Agropyron introgression on the wheat chromosome 7D also improved drought tolerance in the translocation line (TL) during vegetative development compared to parental control, Pavon 76 (P76) (FIG. 1a ; Placido et al., 2013, Plant Physiol., 161:1806-19). TL apparently exhibits drought tolerance by mitigating the decline in lateral root emergence and lateral root growth experienced by P76 under LW (FIG. 1b, 1c ). TL maintained its photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in limited water (LW) conditions, while P76 showed a significant drop in these two parameters (FIG. 1d, 1e ). No difference was observed between TL and P76 in well-watered (WW) conditions.

To discover the Agropyron gene underlying lateral root-associated drought tolerance in TL, we performed root transcriptome assays in well-watered (WW) and limited water (LW) conditions. A gene that we have named Lateral Root Density 7 (LRD7) was identified, which harbors KNOX2 and homeobox domains (FIG. 15). LRD7 was mapped to chromosome 7DL of wheat, corresponding to the Agropyron translocation region (Placido et al., 2013, Plant Physiol., 161:1806-19). We sequenced the coding region of LRD7 and identified polymorphisms that confirmed that TL carries the Agropyron allele of LRD7 (FIG. 15). To test the allele-specific drought stress regulation of LRD7Ag, we performed qRT-PCR on TL and P76 in WW and LW conditions. In contrast to the wheat allele (LRD7Ta), the LRD7Ag allele is down-regulated in response to water stress in TL (FIG. 1f ). These results suggest that drought tolerance in TL is correlated with down-regulation of LRD7Ag during water limitation, likely a consequence of sequence differences associated with the Agropyron donor translocation.

(wheat LRD nucleic acid sequence)

SEQ ID NO: 1

ATGACACACTATGTGCTGCTCCTCTGTTCCTTCAAGGAACAGCTCCAGCA

GCATGTGCGCGTCCACGCCATGGAGGCGGTGATGGCCTGCTGGGAGCTCG

AGCAAACTTTGCAGAGTCTTACAGGGGCATCTCCTGGTGAAGGCACCGGG

GCAACTATGTCCGATGACGAAGACAATCCGGTCGACAGTGAGAGCAACAT

GTTTGACGGGAACGATGTGTCAGATGGCATGGGCTTCGGAATGCTAACCG

AGGGTGAGAGATCCTTGGTCGAGCGCGTGAGGCAAGAGCTGAAGCATGAG

CTTAAACAGGGGTATAGAGAAAAGCTTGTGGACATCAGGGAGGAGATACT

GCGGAAGCGAAGAGCCGGAAAGCTCCCAGGGGACACGGCGTCTACCCTGA

AAGCTTGGTGGCAAGCCCACGCCAAATGGCCGTACCCAACTGAGGAGGAC

AAGGCGCGGCTGGTGCAGGAGACGGGGCTGCAGCTGAAGCAGATCAACAA

CTGGTTCATCAACCAGCGCAAGCGGAACTGGCACAGCAACCCTACCTCGT

CCTCGTCAGACAAGAGCAAGAGAAAAAGGAACAATGCAGGTGAAGGCAAC

GCCGAGCAGTCCTGGTAG

(wheat LRD amino acid sequence)

SEQ ID NO: 2

MTHYVLLLCSFKEQLQQHVRVHAMEAVMACWELEQTLQSLTGASPGEGTG

ATMSDDEDNPVDSESNMFDGNDVSDGMGFGMLTEGERSLVERVRQELKHE

LKQGYREKLVDIREEILRKRRAGKLPGDTASTLKAWWQAHAKWPYPTEED

KARLVQETGLQLKQINNWFINQRKRNWHSNPTSSSSDKSKRKRNNAGEGN

AEQSW

Example 20—Transgenic Wheat Having Altered Expression of LRD7

To test this hypothesis, we characterized wheat transgenic events with altered expression of the wheat allele, LRD7Ta. Six-day-old seedlings from wild type CBO37, three RNAi and three overexpression events (OE) from T3 generation were grown in WW and LW conditions. The RNAi plants did not show a significant change in lateral root number and lateral root density in LW (FIG. 11a ). In contrast, the lateral root density and lateral root number of CBO37 and the OE plants in LW decreased by nearly 40% of the WW controls. No significant differences were observed in primary and seminal root lengths and shoot length for all three genotypes (FIG. 16). Thus, constitutive suppression of wheat LRD7 mirrors the Agropyron translocation by maintaining lateral root production during drought, thereby supporting our hypothesis.

(RNAi to wheat LRD)

SEQ ID NO: 5

GCTGGGAGCTCGAGCAAACTCTGCAGAGTCTTACAGGGGCATCTCCTGGT

GAAGGCACCGGGGCAACTATGTCCGATGACGAAGACAATCCGGTCGACAG

TGAGAGCAACATGTTTGACGGGAACGATGTGTCAGATGGCATGGGCTTCG

GAATGCTAACCGAGGGTGAGAGATCCTTGGTCGAGCGCGTGAGGCAAGAG

CTGAAGCATGAGCTTAAACAGGGGTATAGAGAAAAGCTTGTGGACATCAG

GGAGGAGATACTGCGGAAGCGAAGAGCCGGAAAGCTCCCAGGGGACACGG

CGTCTACCCTGAAAGCTTGGTGGCAAGCCCACGCCAAATGGCCGTACCCA

ACTGAGGAGGACAAGGCGC

Morphological and physiological measurements also were recorded for plants exposed to longer (20 d) LW treatment, initiated 7 d post germination (FIG. 11). RNAi plants had longer roots and higher root biomass in LW compared to CBO37 and the OE events (FIG. 11b, 11d ). The LRD7 RNAi events at pre-tillering stage had higher shoot biomass relative to CBO37 in both WW and LW conditions (FIG. 17). The 50% decline in stomatal conductance in CBO37 and OE was not observed in the RNAi events in LW (FIG. 11e ). Decline in photosynthetic rate (Pn) was greater in CBO37 and the OE events compared to the RNAi events (FIG. 11f ). Collectively, these data suggest that wheat LRD7 negatively regulates root biomass, and its suppression during drought is necessary for continued growth in limited water conditions.

Surprisingly, we observed an increase in seed size, 1000-grain weight and number of seeds per plant in LRD7 RNAi events grown to maturity under well-watered greenhouse conditions, while number of tillers was unchanged (FIGS. 12 and 18). In contrast, the LRD7 OE plants had smaller seeds and reduced seed number relative to CBO37. These results suggest that in optimal water conditions, LRD7 negatively regulates reproductive sink capacity and yield components. In this context, it is noteworthy that LRD7Ta is expressed during early seed development and its transcript abundance peaks at 48 h after pollination (“hap”), which corresponds to the developmental window when wheat seeds exhibit rapid increase in size (FIG. 19). To further test the impact of LRD7 suppression on grain yield, we planted the RNAi and OE events and CBO37 in field conditions and observed a 14.0% increase in the 1000-grain weight for the RNAi events relative to CBO37 (FIG. 20).

Example 21—Gibberellic Acid and LRD7

Transcriptomic comparison of the TL line and P76 indicated the differential regulation of several gibberellic acid associated genes (GSE42214; Table 8). Therefore, we tested the role of GA in lateral root regulation by treating TL and P76 seedlings with 104 GA3 in WW and LW conditions. GA treatment in LW restored lateral root number and density to WW levels in P76 (Table 1). Notably, GA treatment increased the TL lateral root number and density under LW to above the untreated values for both LW and WW conditions, suggesting higher GA sensitivity (Table 7). In contrast, GA treatment had no effect on roots of either genotype under WW conditions. Consistent with the lateral root promoting effect of GA in wheat, GA biosynthesis inhibitor specifically suppressed lateral root formation in both P76 and TL (Table 9). Given the positive impact of exogenous GA on lateral roots, we measured the endogenous GA level in 6 d seedling roots. GA1 decreased in P76 in LW compared to WW (FIG. 13a ). However, GA1 did not differ significantly in TL in response to LW. This suggests that exogenously applied GA compensates for reduced GA in P76 during water stress, thereby stimulating lateral root formation. Higher GA levels in TL than P76 in LW is likely associated with its ability to maintain lateral root growth in LW. Auxin, which promotes lateral root growth, was not deficient in P76 relative to TL in LW, further supporting a GA-dependent mechanism for maintaining lateral root growth in TL (FIG. 21) (Orman-Ligeza et al., 2013, Trends Plant Sci., 18:459-67; Lavenus et al, 2013, Trends Plant Sci., 18:450-8).

TABLE 7

The Effect of Gibberellin A3 (GA3) on lateral root density

	Primary Root	Lateral Root	Lateral Root
Treatments	Length (cm)	(PR)	Density (cm⁻¹)

P76, WW	25.9 ± 2.6	20 ± 5	0.86 ± 0.2
P76, WW (+GA₃)	25.5 ± 2.8	24 ± 4	0.96 ± 0.1
TL, WW	26.6 ± 2.3	23 ± 4	0.86 ± 0.1
TL, WW (+GA₃)	27 2 ± 2.2	24 ± 5	0.89 ± 0.2
P76, LW	18.8 ± 2.2^a	10 ± 3^a	0.53 ± 0.1^a
P76, LW (+GA₃)	23.9 ± 2.2^b	23 ± 3^b	0.96 ± 0.1^b
TL, LW	27.3 ± 2.7	28 ± 4	1.01 ± 0.1
TL, LW (+GA₃)	26.4 ± 2.4	38 ± 4^b	1.44 ± 0.1^b

^arepresents significant difference between WW and LW treatments for a given genotype at p < 0.05 and
^bindicates significant difference between untreated control and GA₃at p < 0.05 (mean ± s.d., _n = 30).
Number of replicates = 3.

TABLE 8

Gene involved in GA biosynthesis, signaling and
response in roots of Agropyron translocation line
(TL) in response to limited-water stress

		Log Fold
Wheat Gene ID	Rice Description	Change	p-value

Traes_3B_7ABEA6AAD	Gibberellin 2-beta-	−2.40	1E−03
	dioxygenase
Traes_7DL_06A129BOD	Gibberellin
20	2.68	2E−13
	oxidase2
Traes_5DS_BE4C8D436	GID1L2	−0.73	1E−03
Traes_3B_6D7154F9	DELLA	−0.71	3E−03

TABLE 9

Effect of GA biosynthesis inhibitor Paclobutrazol
(PAC) on lateral root density

Genotypes,	Primary Root	Number of	Lateral Root
Treatments	Length (cm)	Lateral Roots	Density (cm−1)

P76, WW	25.2 ± 2.4	24 ± 3	0.93 ± 0.1
P76, WW (+PAC)	25.3 ± 3.0	11 ± 2^b	0.45 ± 0.1^b
P76, LW	20.3 ± 1.3^a	13 ± 3	0.55 ± 0.1^a
P76, LW (+PAC)	24.2 ± 2.9	5 ± 2^b	0.22 ± 0.1^b
TL, WW	26.9 ± 3.1	25 ± 5	0.91 ± 0.2
TL, WW (+PAC)	22.7 ± 2.4	11 ± 2^b	0.49 ± 0.1^b
TL, LW	26.0 ± 6.0	24 ± 7	0.87 ± 0.2
TL, LW (+PAC)	23.9 ± 2.6	10 ± 1^b	0.41 ± 0.1^b

Root measurements were done on 6 d old seedlings,
^aindicates a significant difference between WW and LW treatment for P76 at p < 0.05;
^bindicates a significant difference between non-PAC and PAC-treated roots of each genotype at p < 0.05.

Since lower LRD7 expression and higher GA levels correlated with maintaining lateral roots in LW, we tested for a mechanistic link between GA and LRD7. The root transcript abundance of LRD7Ag in GA pretreated TL seedlings in LW was repressed 5-fold relative to untreated WW control (FIG. 13b ). GA pretreatment also decreased LRD7Ta expression in P76 roots compared to LW (no GA) roots, but its expression was similar to WW controls, in contrast to LRD7Ag (FIG. 13c ). These data suggest that the LRD7Ag is more sensitive to GA inhibition than LRD7Ta. Further, root GA1 levels decreased in CBO37 and OE plants in LW but did not change in the LRD7 RNAi events, suggesting LRD7 may regulate GA homeostasis (FIG. 22).

To explore the underlying basis of GA level differences, we measured the transcript abundance of GA biosynthesis, catabolic and signaling genes (GA20ox, GA2ox, GID1, and SLR1) (FIGS. 13d, 13e , and 23). Notably, the expression of a GA catabolic gene, GA2ox, is strongly up-regulated in response to LW in P76, CBO37 and the OE, whereas it did not change in TL and RNAi roots (FIGS. 13d, 13e ). This suggests that in water-stressed P76, CBO37 and OE plants, a GA catabolic gene is strongly induced and lowers GA levels. However, relatively stable GA1 levels in the TL and RNAi roots are associated with continued lateral root growth in LW. Knotted1, a KNOX gene in maize also positively regulates GA2ox1 and consequently lowers GA levels (Bolduc et al., 2008, Sci. Signal, 1:pe28). Transgenically suppressing LRD7 expression in wheat prevents increased GA2ox expression in LW, presumably contributing to maintenance of GA levels.

Example 22—The Effects of LRD in Rice

We next determined if LRD7 could influence grain yield in rice, the most important crop for food security. By repressing the rice homolog of LRD7, OsLRD7 (Os06g43860) via RNAi, we observed an increase in seed size, number of tillers and 1,000-grain weight compared to the wild type Kitaake in field conditions (FIG. 14). Rice LRD RNAi plants also have higher root biomass relative to wild type plants when grown to maturity in well-watered controlled conditions. These data suggest that rice OsLRD7 regulates grain yield in rice under well-watered paddy conditions via increased grain size and more grains per plant compared to the wild type control.

(rice LRD nucleic acid sequence)

SEQ ID NO: 3

ATGGCGTTCCACTACCAGGACCACGCGCTGGCGATGGACGCCGCGGCTGC

GGCGGCGGAGACGGGCGGCCACCACCACCCTGGGTTCGTCGGGGCGGGAG

GAGTTGTGGGGGGAGGAGGAGGAGGAGGGTGGGAGCGGGAGAAGGCCGCC

ATCGCGGCGCACCCGCTGTACGAGCGGCTGCTGGAGGCGCACGTCGCGTG

CCTCCGCGTCGCCACCCCCGTCGACCAGCTGCCCCGCATCGACGCGCAGA

TTGCGGCGCGCCCCCCGCCGCTGGCCGCCGCCACGGCCGCAGCGGCGGCC

GCGGCGGCCGGAGGGGCGCCGTCCGGCGGCGAGGAGCTCGACCTCTTCAT

GACCCATTATGTATTGCTCCTTTGTTCGTTCAAGGAACAACTACAGCAAC

ATGTGCGTGTTCATGCAATGGAAGCAGTAATGGCTTGCTGGGAACTTGAA

CAAACTTTACAGAGCCTTACAGGGGCATCTCCTCGTGAAGGTTCTGGAGC

AACTATGTCTGATGACGAAGACAATCAGGTTGATAGTGAGAGCAACATGT

TTGATGGAAATGATGGATCAGATGGTATGGGCTTTGGCCCCTTAATGCTG

ACGGAGGGCGAGAGATCATTAGTTGAGCGTGTACGGCAAGAGCTGAAACA

TGAGCTTAAACAGGGGTACAGAGAAAAGCTTGTGGACATTAGGGAAGAGA

TACTCCGAAAGCGAAGAGCTGGAAAACTCCCAGGAGATACAGCGTCTACT

TTGAAAGCATGGTGGCAGGCTCACTCTAAATGGCCATACCCAACTGAGGA

GGACAAGGCTCGCTTGGTGCAGGAAACAGGGTTGCAACTAAAACAGATCA

ATAATTGGTTTATCAACCAACGTAAACGGAACTGGCACAGCAATCCTGCT

TCATCCTCATCAGACAAAAGCAAGAGAAAAAGAAGCAATGCAGGTGATGG

CAAGGCCGAGCAATCTTGGTAG

(rice LRD amino acid sequence)

SEQ ID NO: 4

MAFHYQDHALAMDAAAAAAETGGHHHPGFVGAGGVVGGGGGGGWEREKAA

IAAHPLYERLLEAHVACLRVATPVDQLPRIDAQIAARPPPLAAATAAAAA

AAAGGAPSGGEELDLFMTHYVLLLCSFKEQLQQHVRVHAMEAVMACWELE

QTLQSLTGASPREGSGATMSDDEDNQVDSESNMFDGNDGSDGMGFGPLML

TEGERSLVERVRQELKHELKQGYREKLVDIREEILRKRRAGKLPGDTAST

LKAWWQAHSKWPYPTEEDKARLVQETGLQLKQINNWFINQRKRNWHSNPA

SSSSDKSKRKRSNAGDGKAEQSW

(RNAi to rice LRD)

SEQ ID NO: 6

ATGGAAGCAGTAATGGCTTGCTGGGAACTTGAACAAACTTTACAGAGCCT

TACAGGGGCATCTCCTCGTGAAGGTTCTGGAGCAACTATGTCTGATGACG

AAGACAATCAGGTTGATAGTGAGAGCAACATGTTTGATGGAAATGATGGA

TCAGATGGTATGGGCTTTGGCCCCTTAATGCTGACGGAGGGCGAGAGATC

ATTAGTTGAGCGTGTACGGCAAGAGCTGAAACATGAGCTTAAACAGGGGT

ACAGAGAAAAGCTTGTGGACATTAGGGAAGAGATACTCCGAAAGCGAAGA

GCTGGAAAACTCCCAGGAGATACAGCGTCTACTTTGAAAGCATGGTGGCA

GGCTCACTCTAAATGGCCATACCCAACTGAGGAGGACAAGGCTCGCTTGG

TGCAGGAAACAGGGTTGCAACTAAAACAGATCAATAATTGGTTTATCAAC

CAACGTAAACGGAACTGGCAC

TABLE 10

Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR

	Gene			SEQ ID	Product
Wheat Gene ID	Annotation	Left Primer (5′ to 3′)	Right Primer (5′ to 3′)	NOs	size (bp)

LRD7	LRD7Ta	CCTTCAAGGAACAGCTCCAG	CTCTCACTGTCGACCGGATT	54, 55	166

LRD7	LRD7	GTTTGACGGGAACGATGT	ATACCCCTGTTTAAGCTC	56, 57	114

LRD7	LRD7Ag	GTTCGATGGAAATGATGT	GTACCCCTGTTTAAGCTC		58, 59	151

Traes_3B_7ABEA6AAD	GA20x	GTTCAAGAGCGTGAAGCACA	GTACTCGCCCCATGTGAAGT		60, 61	163

Traes_7DL_06A129B0D	GA20ox	ACATCGACGACACCTTCTCC	ATCCAGGGTCCTCCAGTCAG		62, 63	251

Traes_5DS_BE4C8D436	GID1	CGGTGATCAAAGGAAGATGG	ATATTTCTCGGCGTCTCCAA	64, 65	252

Traes_3B_6D71543F9	DELLA	GGTGAAGCAGATACCCTTGC	GGGCAGGACTCGTAGAAGTG	66, 67	177

	Internal	TGAGGTTGTCAAGCAACAGG	CATAAGACCAGCCCAAGCAT	68, 69	152
	Control

TABLE 11

Primer pairs used for the construction of the LRD7 RNAi-89, RNAi-91, RNAi-92
lines in CBO37 background

Primer Name	Primer Sequence	Lower case bases	SEQ ID NO

PUbi-Int-F	5′ TTTTaagcttGGTGCAGCGTG 3′	HindIII site	70

Pubi-Sma-R	5′ TTTTcccgggTTCTCGAGCGACCTGCAGAAG 3′	SmaI site	71

T35S-SmaI-F	5′ TTTTcccgggTAGAGTCCGCAAAAATCACC 3′	SmaI site	72

T35S-EcoRI-R	5′ TTTTgaattcGCAGGTCACTGGATTTTGGTT 3′	EcoRI site	73

K369-BH1-F	5′ TTTTggatccGCTGGGAGCTCGAGCAAA 3′	BamHI site	74

K369-Xb1-R	5′ TTTtctagaGCGCCTTGTCCTCCTCAGT 3′	XbaI site	75

K369-SmaI-R	5′ TTTTtctagacccgggGCGCCTTGTCCTCCTCAGT 3′	XbaI and SmaI sites	76

Part C Example 23—Rice Homolog of the E2F-Related Gene

We characterized the rice homolog (LOC_Os06g50310) of the wheat E2F-related gene. Over-expression of OsbZIP53 in rice driven by a maize ubiquitin promoter induces developmental defects. For example, seed size is dramatically increased by the over-expression of OsbZIP53 (FIGS. 26A and 26B). That is, the length, width and thickness of seeds were approximately 26%, 16%, and 16% higher, respectively, in the over-expression plants than those in wild type plants (FIG. 26C-26E). In contrast, the knock-down, RNAi lines of OsbZIP53 have reduced seed size. The seed width and thickness were 4% to 6% and 9% to 12% smaller, respectively, than those from wild type plants (FIGS. 26D and 26E). The decrease in seed size was consistent with the suppression of OsbZIP53.

(rice E2F-related nucleic acid sequence)

LOC_Os06g50310

SEQ ID NO: 9

ATGGATGACGGGGACCTCGATTTCTCCAACCCGGACACATTCCTCTGCCC

GGCCGTCGGTGGTGCTGACCCCGACGGCAGCTGCTCCATGGACAGCTATT

TCGACGACATCCTCAAGGATACGGAGCACCATGCATGCACCCACACCCAC

ACCTGCAACCCGCCTGTGCATGACCTCTCACACACCCACACCTGCGTCCA

TGTCCACACCAAGATCGTCTCCGCCCCATCCGACACTCCGTCGGATGCTG

CCGAGACCGCCGAGTCCCCGACGGAGAACAATGCCTCCAAGAAGCGGCCG

TCGGGTAACCGTGCCGCTGTGAGGAAGTACAGGGAGAAGAAGAAAGCTCA

CACTGCCTCGCTGGAGGAGGAGGTTGTTCATTTGAGGGCTCTAAACCAGC

AGCTCATGAAGAAGCTCCAGAACCATGCCACGCTCGAGGCAGAGGTATCC

AGGCTGCGGTGCCTGCTCGTTGATATTAGAGGAAGGATTGAAGGGGAGAT

TGGGGCTTTTCCTTATCAGAGGCCAGTGAAGAACATCGATTTGGTTTCTA

GTGTTGATCAGGGAAGTTATCTTGGTGGTGCCCAGGTTATGAACTCCTGT

GACTTTCGATGTGCCGACCAGATGTATTGCAGTCCAGGGATGCAGGTGAG

AACAATGGGCGAGGATGGCGCTGTGAGTGGTCAGGTGTTGGGGCAAGGTG

CCTGTGATATTGCCAGTATCCAATGCCAAGGTGCAAAATCTGGATCTGCA

AAGCTCCCAGTCTGTGGGGCTATGGGTACGATGCCTGTCGGCTGTATGCC

AAATTCTGAAAAGAAATGA

(rice E2F-related amino acid sequence)

LOC_Os06g50310

SEQ ID NO: 10

MDDGDLDFSNPDTFLCPAVGGADPDGSCSMDSYFDDILKDTEHHACTHTH

TCNPPVHDLSHTHTCVHVHTKIVSAPSDTPSDAAETAESPTENNASKKRP

SGNRAAVRKYREKKKAHTASLEEEVVHLRALNQQLMKKLQNHATLEAEVS

RLRCLLVDIRGRIEGEIGAFPYQRPVKNIDLVSSVDQGSYLGGAQVMNSC

DFRCADQMYCSPGMQVRTMGEDGAVSGQVLGQGACDIASIQCQGAKSGSA

KLPVCGAMGTMPVGCMPNSEKK

(wheat E2F-related nucleic acid sequence)

SEQ ID NO: 11

TCATTTTCACAAAATTACTTTAAATAGCACGATAATCCTACACACACACG

GACCCTTTACGAGCTTTTACGTGATTTTCTTCTAACTAATCTCTCTCCCG

CTGAAATTCAGCGGGGGTGGACCCCATCCTCCCCTCTTGTCCAATCCCAA

TCGCCCACGTCTGTTAGTCCGTGAACCCCGTAATCAATCCCTCCCTGAGT

CTAGCATTACTCTAAATAACAATTAGTACGATATTTTTGGTCCCAATTGA

CTTTTCTTTCCCGAGTTAGCATCCAATGTAACTATGCTTGAACGGAAATA

AAGCTAGCCAAGAAGGCTTTTCATACAAAAAAAGACGATAATGGCATAAA

ATTTATCTCAGAAGGCAACGTATCCAAAGTAAAATTCTGATGCTACTCTT

TTCTTTTACTAATGATGAAAACAAACAGGAGGCTGTTCACAGGTTCGTAC

GAAGCCACATGAGCTCATCATGACCGGGCCAGCAGAGCCCGGGCCGTCGC

CCTTGGCCGGTCGGCGCTGGTAAGGGAAGGCGCCGATCTCCCCTTCGATC

CTGCCCCTGACGTCGACGAGCAGGCAGCGCAGCCTGGCCGCCTCGGCCTC

GAGCGCGGCGTGGTCCTGGACCTTCTTGGTGAGCTGCTCGTTCATAGCCC

TGAGACGGGCCGCCTCCTCCTGCAGCACCGCCGTGTGCTCCTTCTTCTTC

TCGCGGTACTTGCGCACGGCCGCCCGGTTGCCTGACGGGCGGCGCTTCTT

GCTCCGGGAGGTGGCGTGGGCGTCCTCCGGCTCGGTGGGGGAGTCGGCGG

CGGCGGCGTCGGAGGAGGCGGAGGCGGCGAGCTTGGAGTGGACGTGGTGG

CAGGTGTGGCTGTGGGGGAGGTCGTGGGCGGGCGGGTTGCACGTGTGGGT

GTGGGTGCAGCACGCGAGGTGCTCCGCCGCGCCCCCGAGCACGTCGTCGA

AGTAGCTGCCCATGGACATGGAGGAGAAGTCCAGGTCCCCGTCGTCCATG

GCCGCGATCGATTTGCAGCGACCAGGAGACGCTTAATTAGCCTGTGCTCA

CGTGACGCTTGCATTTGTTTCTTA

It is to be understood that, while the methods and compositions of matter have been described herein in conjunction with a number of different aspects, the foregoing description of the various aspects is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the methods and compositions of matter. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.

Disclosed are methods and compositions that can be used for, can be used in conjunction with, can be used in preparation for, or are products of the disclosed methods and compositions. These and other materials are disclosed herein, and it is understood that combinations, subsets, interactions, groups, etc. of these methods and compositions are disclosed. That is, while specific reference to each various individual and collective combinations and permutations of these compositions and methods may not be explicitly disclosed, each is specifically contemplated and described herein. For example, if a particular composition of matter or a particular method is disclosed and discussed and a number of compositions or methods are discussed, each and every combination and permutation of the compositions and the methods are specifically contemplated unless specifically indicated to the contrary. Likewise, any subset or combination of these is also specifically contemplated and disclosed.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A plant variety, line, or cultivar comprising plants having a mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 3, wherein the mutation results in reduced expression of the endogenous nucleic acid relative to corresponding plants lacking the mutation, wherein the plants exhibit an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions.

2. Seed produced by the plant variety, line, or cultivar of claim 1, the seed comprising the mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 3, wherein the mutation results in reduced expression of the endogenous nucleic acid in plants grown from the seed, relative to corresponding plants lacking the mutation, wherein plants grown from the seed exhibit an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a plant grown from corresponding seed lacking the mutation grown under corresponding conditions.

3. A method of making a plant, comprising the steps of:

inducing mutagenesis in plant cells to produce mutagenized cells;

obtaining one or more plants from the mutagenized cells;

identifying plants that comprises a mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 3 and exhibit reduced expression of the endogenous nucleic acid relative to plants lacking the mutation; and

identifying plants that exhibits an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein mutagenesis is induced using a chemical mutagen or ionizing radiation.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the chemical mutagen is selected from the group consisting of nitrous acid, sodium azide, acridine orange, ethidium bromide, and ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS).

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the ionizing radiation is selected from the group consisting of x-rays, gamma rays, fast neutron irradiation, and UV irradiation.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein mutagenesis is induced using TALEN technology, zinc-finger technology, or CRISPR technology.

8. A method for producing a plant, said method comprising the steps of:

crossing at least one plant of a first line with at least one plant of a second line, the plant of the first line having a mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 3, wherein the mutation results in reduced expression of the endogenous nucleic acid relative to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation; and

selecting for progeny plants that have the mutation and exhibit reduced expression of the endogenous nucleic acid relative to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation; and

selecting for progeny plants exhibiting an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions.

9. A food or feed product comprising plant material from the plant of claim 1.

10. The food or feed product of claim 9, wherein the food product is for human consumption.

11. The food or feed product of claim 9, wherein the feed product is for animal consumption.

12. A method of producing a food or feed product, the method comprising:

providing plant material from a plant having a mutation in one or more endogenous nucleic acids having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 3, wherein the mutation results in reduced expression of the endogenous nucleic acid relative to a plant lacking the mutation, wherein the plants exhibit an increase in the length of the primary root under limiting water conditions, an increase in the length of the seminal root under limiting water conditions, an increase in lateral root density under limiting water conditions, an increase in root biomass under limiting water conditions, an increase in the number of seeds per plant under water conditions that are not limiting, an increase in the average size of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting, and/or an increase in the average weight of the seed under water conditions that are not limiting relative to a corresponding plant lacking the mutation under corresponding conditions; and

manufacturing a food or feed product using the plant material.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the mutation is selected from the group consisting of a point mutation, an insertion, a deletion, and a substitution.